The use of noninvasive ventilation in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: A systematic review

被引:99
作者
Collins, Sean P.
Mielniczuk, Lisa M.
Whittingham, Heather A.
Boseley, Mark E.
Schramm, David R.
Storrow, Alan B.
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Div Pulm Crit Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Otol & Laryngol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Otolaryngol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema is a common cause of respiratory distress in emergency department (ED) patients. Noninvasive ventilation by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure has been studied as a treatment strategy. We critically evaluate the evidence for the use of noninvasive ventilation on rates of hospital mortality and endotracheal intubation. Methods: We searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2005. Additional sources included key journals, bibliographies of selected articles, and expert contact. We included studies that incorporated a randomized design; patients older than 18 years and with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema; diagnosis and treatment initiated in the ED; noninvasive ventilation in addition to standard medical therapy compared to standard medical therapy alone, or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation compared to continuous positive airway pressure (both in addition to standard medical therapy); and data on hospital mortality or intubation. A random-effects model was used to obtain the summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cis) for hospital mortality and intubation. Results: A pooled analysis of 494 patients suggested that noninvasive ventilation in addition to standard medical therapy significantly reduced hospital mortality compared to standard medical therapy alone (RR 0.61; [95% Cl 0.41, 0.91]). Similarly, a meta-analysis of 436 patients suggested that noninvasive ventilation was associated with a significant decrease in intubation rates (RR 0.43; [95% Cl 0.21, 0.87]). Conclusion: Our results suggest that noninvasive ventilation with standard medical therapy is advantageous over standard medical therapy alone in ED patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Future studies, powered appropriately for mortality and intubation rates, are necessary to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 269
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   EFFECT OF NASAL CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE ON CARDIAC-OUTPUT AND OXYGEN DELIVERY IN PATIENTS WITH CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE [J].
BARATZ, DM ;
WESTBROOK, PR ;
SHAH, PK ;
MOHSENIFAR, Z .
CHEST, 1992, 102 (05) :1397-1401
[2]   Noninvasive pressure support ventilation vs. continuous positive airway pressure in acute hypercapnic pulmonary edema [J].
Bellone, A ;
Vettorello, M ;
Monari, A ;
Cortellaro, F ;
Coen, D .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (06) :807-811
[3]   Myocardial infarction rate in acute pulmonary edema: Noninvasive pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure [J].
Bellone, A ;
Monari, A ;
Cortellaro, F ;
Vettorello, M ;
Arlati, S ;
Coen, D .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (09) :1860-1865
[4]   TREATMENT OF SEVERE CARDIOGENIC PULMONARY-EDEMA WITH CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE DELIVERED BY FACE MASK [J].
BERSTEN, AD ;
HOLT, AW ;
VEDIG, AE ;
SKOWRONSKI, GA ;
BAGGOLEY, CJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (26) :1825-1830
[5]   Randomised controlled comparison of continuous positive airways pressure, bilevel non-invasive ventilation, and standard treatment in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema [J].
Crane, SD ;
Elliott, MW ;
Gilligan, P ;
Richards, K ;
Gray, AJ .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (02) :155-161
[6]   Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a randomised comparison of continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure [J].
Cross, AM ;
Cameron, P ;
Kierce, M ;
Ragg, M ;
Kelly, AM .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 20 (06) :531-534
[7]   CARDIAC-PERFORMANCE IN RESPONSE TO PEEP IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DYSFUNCTION [J].
GRACE, MP ;
GREENBAUM, DM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1982, 10 (06) :358-360
[8]   Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Moore, RA ;
Carroll, D ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Reynolds, DJM ;
Gavaghan, DJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01) :1-12
[9]   INFLUENCE OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE ON LEFT-VENTRICULAR PERFORMANCE [J].
JARDIN, F ;
FARCOT, JC ;
BOISANTE, L ;
CURIEN, N ;
MARGAIRAZ, A ;
BOURDARIAS, JP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 304 (07) :387-392
[10]   INSPIRATORY WORK WITH AND WITHOUT CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE [J].
KATZ, JA ;
MARKS, JD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1985, 63 (06) :598-607