Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons

被引:27
作者
Cheng, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Peng [1 ]
Sun, Dong [1 ]
Qin, Tingzheng [1 ]
Ma, Zikun [1 ]
Liu, Jingpei [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, China Japan Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Changchun 130033, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Spinal injury classification; Thoracolumbar; Consensus; Reliability; Reproducibility; POSTERIOR LIGAMENTOUS COMPLEX; INTEGRITY; FRACTURE; MORPHOLOGY; MECHANISM; VALIDITY; MRI; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-016-4842-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
The objective of this study was to analyze the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the new AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system in young Chinese orthopedic surgeons with different levels of experience in spinal trauma. Previous reports suggest that the new AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system demonstrates acceptable interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. However, there are few studies in Asia, especially in China. The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system was applied to 109 patients with acute, traumatic thoracolumbar spinal injuries by two groups of spinal surgeons with different levels of clinical experience. The Kappa coefficient was used to determine interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. The overall Kappa coefficient for all cases was 0.362, which represents fair reliability. The Kappa statistic was 0.385 for A-type injuries and 0.292 for B-type injuries, which represents fair reliability, and 0.552 for C-type injuries, which represents moderate reliability. The Kappa coefficient for intraobserver reproducibility was 0.442 for A-type injuries, 0.485 for B-type injuries, and 0.412 for C-type injuries. These values represent moderate reproducibility for all injury types. The raters in Group A provided significantly better interobserver reliability than Group B (P < 0.05). There were no between-group differences in intraobserver reproducibility. This study suggests that the new AO spine injury classification system may be applied in day-to-day clinical practice in China following extensive training of healthcare providers. Further prospective studies in different healthcare providers and clinical settings are essential for validation of this classification system and to assess its utility.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1482
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Classification of thoracolumbar fractures and dislocations [J].
Aebi, Max .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 :2-7
[2]
Azimi Parisa, 2015, Asian J Neurosurg, V10, P282, DOI 10.4103/1793-5482.162703
[3]
Imaging of spinal trauma [J].
Bagley, LJ .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 44 (01) :1-+
[4]
Blauth M, 1999, ORTHOPADE, V28, P662, DOI 10.1007/PL00003655
[5]
DAFFNER RH, 1990, SKELETAL RADIOL, V19, P103
[7]
SCOLIOSIS-RESEARCH-SOCIETY - MULTICENTER SPINE FRACTURE STUDY [J].
GERTZBEIN, SD .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (05) :528-540
[8]
Comparison of spine injuries by means of CT and MRI according to the classification of Magerl [J].
Grünhagen, J ;
Egbers, HJ ;
Heller, M ;
Reuter, M .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2005, 177 (06) :828-834
[9]
Intrarater and interrater reliability and validity in the assessment of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex:: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries -: Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005 [J].
Harrop, JS ;
Vaccaro, AR ;
Hurlbert, RJ ;
Wilsey, JT ;
Baron, EM ;
Shaffrey, CI ;
Fisher, CG ;
Dvorak, MF ;
Öner, FC ;
Wood, KB ;
Anand, N ;
Anderson, DG ;
Lim, MR ;
Lee, JY ;
Bono, CM ;
Arnold, PM ;
Rampersaud, YR ;
Fehlings, MG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (02) :118-122
[10]
Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population [J].
Hu, R ;
Mustard, CA ;
Burns, C .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (04) :492-499