Assessing lameness in cows kept in tie-stalls

被引:56
作者
Leach, K. A.
Dippel, S. [1 ]
Huber, J. [2 ]
March, S. [3 ]
Winckler, C. [1 ]
Whay, H. R.
机构
[1] Univ Bodenkultur Wien, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, Div Livestock Sci, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vet Med Vienna, A-2563 Pottenstein, Austria
[3] Univ Gottingen, Res Ctr Anim Prod, D-49377 Vechta, Germany
关键词
welfare; cattle; lameness; tie-stall; DAIRY-CATTLE; CLAW LESIONS; PREVALENCE; LOCOMOTION; BEHAVIOR; WELFARE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2008-1648
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Identifying lame cows and quantifying the prevalence of lameness are important elements of cattle welfare assessment that are generally achieved by methods involving observations of each animal walking. There is no published method for assessing lameness in cows confined in tie-stalls. The objective of this study (carried out within the European Commission's Welfare Quality (R) project) was to develop a suitable method and validate it for lameness detection against a published locomotion score. A series of indicators of lameness visible in tied cows was formalized into a stall assessment protocol. This was validated against a traditional locomotion score and tested for repeatability between 2 observers. A total of 98 cows on 4 farms were assessed. Overall interobserver agreement was 91%. Sensitivity compared with locomotion scoring was 0.54 to 0.77, dependent on observer and threshold definition. Assessment in the stall underestimated the herd prevalence of lameness revealed by locomotion scoring by 11 to 37% (mean 27%). The discrepancy between herd lameness prevalence assessed in the stall and by locomotion scoring was not affected significantly by farm or observer. The cases of lameness that were not detected in the stall tended to be the least severe. The proposed method for lameness detection in tie-stalls could be used for herd-level assessment of lameness and detection of individual lame animals by farmers and their advisors, but it is important to remember that it is less sensitive than locomotion scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:1567 / 1574
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
[2]   Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies [J].
Ashley, FH ;
Waterman-Pearson, AE ;
Whay, HR .
EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 37 (06) :565-575
[3]   Risk factors influencing lameness and claw disorders in dairy cows [J].
Bielfeldt, JC ;
Badertscher, R ;
Tölle, KH ;
Krieter, J .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2005, 95 (03) :265-271
[4]  
*BMLFUW, 2007, GRUN BER 2007
[5]   BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA [J].
BYRT, T ;
BISHOP, J ;
CARLIN, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) :423-429
[6]  
*CANWEST DHI, 2007, 2006 ONT DHI PROGR R
[7]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[8]   Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface [J].
Cook, NB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 223 (09) :1324-+
[9]  
CRAMER G, 2008, P 15 S 7 INT C LAM R, P444
[10]   Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota [J].
Espejo, L. A. ;
Endres, M. I. ;
Salfer, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2006, 89 (08) :3052-3058