SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

被引:157
作者
de Grooth, Harm-Jan [1 ]
Geenen, Irma L. [1 ]
Girbes, Armand R. [1 ]
Vincent, Jean-Louis [2 ]
Parienti, Jean-Jacques [3 ,4 ]
Straaten, Heleen M. Oudemans-van [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care, Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Intens Care, Erasme Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
[3] CHU Caen, Unite Biostat & Rech Clin, Caen, France
[4] Univ Caen Normandie, Fac Med, Risques Microbiens EA4655, Caen, France
关键词
Critical care trials; Multiple organ failure; Sepsis; Surrogate endpoints; FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; INTENSIVE-CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-017-1609-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Background: The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) is increasingly used as an endpoint in intensive care randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although serially measured SOFA is independently associated with mortality in observational cohorts, the association between treatment effects on SOFA vs. effects on mortality has not yet been quantified in RCTs. The aim of this study was to quantify the relationship between SOFA and mortality in RCTs and to identify which SOFA derivative best reflects between-group mortality differences. Methods: The review protocol was prospectively registered (Prospero CRD42016034014). We performed a literature search (up to May 1, 2016) for RCTs reporting both SOFA and mortality, and analyzed between-group differences in these outcomes. Treatment effects on SOFA and mortality were calculated as the between-group SOFA standardized difference and log odds ratio (OR), respectively. We used random-effects meta-regression to (1) quantify the linear relationship between RCT treatment effects on mortality (logOR) and SOFA (i.e. responsiveness) and (2) quantify residual heterogeneity (i.e. consistency, expressed as I-2). Results: Of 110 eligible RCTs, 87 qualified for analysis. Using all RCTs, SOFA was significantly associated with mortality (slope = 0.49 (95% CI 0.17; 0.82), p = 0.006, I-2 = 5%); the overall mortality effect explained by SOFA score (R-2) was 9%. Fifty-eight RCTs used Fixed-day SOFA as an endpoint (i.e. the score on a fixed day after randomization), 25 studies used Delta SOFA as an endpoint (i.e. the trajectory from baseline score) and 15 studies used other SOFA derivatives as an endpoint. Fixed-day SOFA was not significantly associated with mortality (slope = 0.35 (95% CI -0.04; 0.75), p = 0.08, I-2 = 12%) and explained 3% of the overall mortality effect (R-2). Delta SOFA was significantly associated with mortality (slope = 0.70 (95% CI 0.26; 1.14), p = 0.004, I-2 = 0%) and explained 32% of the overall mortality effect (R-2). Conclusions: Treatment effects on Delta SOFA appear to be reliably and consistently associated with mortality in RCTs. Fixed-day SOFA was the most frequently reported outcome among the reviewed RCTs, but was not significantly associated with mortality. Based on this study, we recommend using Delta SOFA rather than Fixed-day SOFA as an endpoint in future RCTs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SURVIV INTENSIVE CAR
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, INT C HARM TECHN REQ
[3]
[Anonymous], MACH LEARN MED
[4]
[Anonymous], PROSPERO INT PROSPEC
[5]
[Anonymous], INTENS CARE MED
[6]
Reliability and accuracy of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring [J].
Arts, DGT ;
de Keizer, NF ;
Vroom, MB ;
de Jonge, E .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) :1988-1993
[7]
Comparison of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring between nurses and residents [J].
Baykara, Nur ;
Gokduman, Kaan ;
Hosten, Tulay ;
Solak, Mine ;
Toker, Kamil .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (06) :839-844
[8]
Interobserver variability in data collection of the APACHE II score in teaching and community hospitals [J].
Chen, LM ;
Martin, CM ;
Morrison, TL ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (09) :1999-2004
[9]
Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients [J].
Ferreira, FL ;
Bota, DP ;
Bross, A ;
Mélot, C ;
Vincent, JL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (14) :1754-1758
[10]
Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? [J].
Fleming, TR ;
DeMets, DL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 125 (07) :605-613