Adverse anesthetic outcomes arising from gas delivery equipment - A closed claims analysis

被引:97
作者
Caplan, RA [1 ]
Vistica, MF [1 ]
Posner, KL [1 ]
Cheney, FW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
anesthesia; claims; complications; injuries; equipment; misuse; failure;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199710000-00006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Anesthesia gas delivery equipment is a potentially important source of patient injury. To better define the contribution of gas delivery equipment to professional liability in anesthesia, the authors conducted an in-depth analysis of cases from the database of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project. Methods: The database of the Closed Claims Project is composed of closed US malpractice claims that have been collected in a standardized manner. All claims resulting from the use of gas delivery equipment were reviewed for recurrent patterns of injury. Results: Gas delivery equipment was associated with 72 (2%) of 3,791 claims in the database. Death and permanent brain damage accounted for almost all adverse outcomes (n = 55, 76%). Equipment misuse was defined as fault or human error associated with the preparation, maintenance, or deployment of a medical device. Equipment failure was defined as unexpected malfunction of a medical device, despite routine maintenance and previous uneventful use. Misuse of equipment (n = 54, 75%) was three times more common than equipment failure (n = 17, 24%). Misconnects and disconnects of the breathing circuit made the largest contribution to injury (n = 25, 35%). Reviewers judged that 38 of 72 claims (53%) could have been prevented by pulse oximetry, capnography, or a combination of these two monitors. Overall, 56 of 72 gas delivery claims (78%) were deemed preventable with the use or better use of monitors. The year of occurrence for claims involving gas delivery equipment ranged from 1962 to 1991 and did not differ significantly from claims involving other adverse respiratory events. Conclusions: Claims associated with gas delivery equipment are infrequent but severe and continue to occur in the 1990s. Educational and preventive strategies that focus on equipment misuse and breathing circuit configuration may have the greatest potential for enhancing the safety of anesthesia gas delivery equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 748
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   BREATHING SYSTEM DISCONNECTIONS [J].
ADAMS, AP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (01) :46-54
[2]   Unusual cause for a circle system leak [J].
Biro, P .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (01) :196-196
[3]  
Buck N., 1987, REPORT CONFIDENTIAL
[4]   ADVERSE RESPIRATORY EVENTS IN ANESTHESIA - A CLOSED CLAIMS ANALYSIS [J].
CAPLAN, RA ;
POSNER, KL ;
WARD, RJ ;
CHENEY, FW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (05) :828-833
[5]   CHECKLISTS AND PATIENT SAFETY [J].
CHARLTON, JE .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (06) :425-426
[6]   STANDARD OF CARE AND ANESTHESIA LIABILITY [J].
CHENEY, FW ;
POSNER, K ;
CAPLAN, RA ;
WARD, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (11) :1599-1603
[7]   ADVERSE RESPIRATORY EVENTS INFREQUENTLY LEADING TO MALPRACTICE SUITS - A CLOSED CLAIMS ANALYSIS [J].
CHENEY, FW ;
POSNER, KL ;
CAPLAN, RA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 75 (06) :932-939
[8]   ACCIDENTS, NEAR ACCIDENTS AND COMPLICATIONS DURING ANESTHESIA - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF A 10-YEAR PERIOD IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL [J].
CHOPRA, V ;
BOVILL, JG ;
SPIERDIJK, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (01) :3-6
[9]   REPORTED SIGNIFICANT OBSERVATIONS DURING ANESTHESIA - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OVER AN 18-MONTH PERIOD [J].
CHOPRA, V ;
BOVILL, JG ;
SPIERDIJK, J ;
KOORNNEEF, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 68 (01) :13-17
[10]   AN ANALYSIS OF MAJOR ERRORS AND EQUIPMENT FAILURES IN ANESTHESIA MANAGEMENT - CONSIDERATIONS FOR PREVENTION AND DETECTION [J].
COOPER, JB ;
NEWBOWER, RS ;
KITZ, RJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1984, 60 (01) :34-42