Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear model

被引:180
作者
Kiebel, SJ [1 ]
Poline, JB
Friston, KJ
Holmes, AP
Worsley, KJ
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Dept Neurol, D-6900 Jena, Germany
[2] Hosp Frederic Joliot, CEA Serv, Orsay, France
[3] Inst Neurol, Wellcome Dept Cognit Neurol, London WC1N 3BG, England
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.1999.0508
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The assessment of significant activations in functional imaging using voxel-based methods often relies on results derived from the theory of Gaussian random fields. These results solve the multiple comparison problem and assume that the spatial correlation or smoothness of the data is known or can be estimated. End results (i.e., P values associated with local maxima, clusters, or sets of clusters) critically depend on this assessment, which should be as exact and as reliable as possible. In some earlier implementations of statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (SPM94, SPM95) the smoothness was assessed on Gaussianized t-fields (Gt-f) that are not generally free of physiological signal. This technique has two limitations. First, the estimation is not stable (the variance of the estimator being far from negligible) and, second, physiological signal in the Gt-f will bias the estimation. In this paper, we describe an estimation method that overcomes these drawbacks. The new approach involves estimating the smoothness of standardized residual fields which approximates the smoothness of the component fields of the associated t-field. Knowing the smoothness of these component fields is important because it allows one to compute corrected P values for statistical fields other than the t-field or the Gt-f (e.g., the F-map) and eschews bias due to deviation from the null hypothesis. We validate the method on simulated data and demonstrate it using data from a functional MRI study. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 766
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Adler R. J., 1981, GEOMETRY RANDOM FIEL
[2]  
Cox D.R., 1996, The Theory of Stochastic Processes
[3]  
FRACKOWIAK RSJ, 1997, HUMAN BRAIN FUNCTION
[4]  
Friston K. J., 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P210
[5]   COMPARING FUNCTIONAL (PET) IMAGES - THE ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGE [J].
FRISTON, KJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
LIDDLE, PF ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1991, 11 (04) :690-699
[6]   Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of inference and power [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Holmes, A ;
Poline, JB ;
Price, CJ ;
Frith, CD .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (03) :223-235
[7]  
Holmes A, 1994, THESIS U GLASGOW
[8]   ESTIMATING SMOOTHNESS IN STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPS - VARIABILITY OF P-VALUES [J].
POLINE, JB ;
WORSLEY, KJ ;
HOLMES, AP ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
FRISTON, KJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (05) :788-796
[9]  
Worsley K., 1996, UNBIASED ESTIMATOR R
[10]   ANALYSIS OF FMRI TIME-SERIES REVISITED - AGAIN [J].
WORSLEY, KJ ;
FRISTON, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1995, 2 (03) :173-181