IT portfolio decision-making in local governments: Rationality, politics, intuition and coincidences

被引:21
作者
Nielsen, Jeppe Agger [1 ]
Pedersen, Keld [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Polit Sci, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
E-government; IT portfolio management; Decision-making; Local government; Case-study; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; PERSPECTIVE; CAPABILITY; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2014.04.002
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
IT project portfolio management (IT PPM) has evolved into a significant area of research interest, but we know little about IT PPM practices in public sector organizations. Therefore this article investigates decision-making processes in the IT PPM practices of local governments, and discusses how these practices match the normative advice proposed by the IT PPM literature. We rely on decision-making theories together with case-studies of four Danish local governments. We find that politics, intuition and coincidence play a crucial role in IT PPM decision-making, while technical rationality (as proposed by the IT PPM literature) plays a minor role. Our account also reveals how the decision-making practices create IT portfolio problems and in some aspects is considered to have a negative impact on the outcome of e-government investments. Our analysis and previous research into decision-making allows us to argue that implementing textbook-IT PPM is difficult because it relies on decision-making ideals that are incompatible with organizational contexts and individual behavior in these organizations. Instead of radically changing decision-making styles, the organizations might be better off improving IT PPM practice within the boundaries of their existing decision-making styles, and the IT PPM literature might improve support for practitioners by incorporating other decision-making styles besides technical rationality. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 420
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   THE LOGIC OF INTUITION - HOW TOP EXECUTIVES MAKE IMPORTANT DECISIONS [J].
AGOR, WH .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1986, 14 (03) :5-18
[2]  
Archer N. P., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5
[3]   Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model [J].
Ashurst, Colin ;
Doherty, Neil F. ;
Peppard, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 17 (04) :352-370
[4]  
Bert De Reyck, 2005, International Journal of Project Management, V23, P524, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.003
[5]   Project portfolio management - There's more to it than what management enacts [J].
University of Southern Denmark, Department of Environmental and Business Economics, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark .
International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26 (04) :357-365
[6]  
Burke L. A., 1999, Academy of Management Perspectives, V13, P91, DOI [10.5465/ame.1999.2570557, DOI 10.5465/AME.1999.2570557]
[7]   Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making [J].
Busenitz, LW ;
Barney, JB .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1997, 12 (01) :9-30
[8]   From models to practice: decision making at portfolio meetings [J].
Christiansen, John ;
Varnes, Claus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2008, 25 (01) :87-+
[9]   GARBAGE CAN MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHOICE [J].
COHEN, MD ;
MARCH, JG ;
OLSEN, JP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1972, 17 (01) :1-25
[10]   Perspective:: The Stage-Gate® idea-to-launch process-update, what's new, and NexGen systems [J].
Cooper, Robert G. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2008, 25 (03) :213-232