How can socio-economic differences in physical activity among women be explained? A qualitative study

被引:80
作者
Ball, Kylie [1 ]
Salmon, Jo
Giles-Corti, Billie
Crawford, David
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Exercise & Nutr Sci, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
physical activity; socio-economic status; qualitative research; women;
D O I
10.1300/J013v43n01_06
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This qualitative study investigated why women of low socio-economic status (SES) are less physically active than women of higher-SES. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 high-, 19 mid- and 18 low-SES women. A social-ecological framework, taking into account intrapersonal, social and environmental level influences, was adopted to guide the development of interview questions and interpretation of data. Thematic analysis identified a number of key influences on physical activity that varied by SES. These included negative early life/family physical activity experiences (a consistent theme among those of low-/mid-SES); participation in a wider range of physical activities in leisure time (high-SES); greater priority given to television viewing (low-SES); lack of time due to work commitments (low-SES); lack of time due to family commitments (high-SES); and neighbourhood-level barriers (low-SES). Financial costs were not perceived as a key barrier by women in any SES group. Public health strategies aimed at reducing SES inequalities in physical activity might focus on overcoming negative early experiences/attitudes to physical activity, reducing television viewing and promoting a wider variety of different types of physical activity, and addressing neighbourhood safety and other barriers to physically active lifestyles in socio-economically disadvantaged areas.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 113
页数:21
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General
[2]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1998, INF PAP 1996 CENS PO
[3]   How feasible are healthy eating and physical activity for young women? [J].
Ball, K ;
Crawford, D ;
Warren, N .
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2004, 7 (03) :433-441
[4]   A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives [J].
Ben-Shlomo, Y ;
Kuh, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (02) :285-293
[5]   Pathways of disadvantage? Walking as a mode of transport among low-income mothers [J].
Bostock, L .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2001, 9 (01) :11-18
[6]  
Britton JA, 2000, WOMEN HEALTH, V31, P81
[7]   Participation in recreational physical activity: Why do socioeconomic groups differ? [J].
Burton, NW ;
Turrell, G ;
Oldenburg, B .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2003, 30 (02) :225-244
[8]   Barriers to physical activity and socioeconomic position: implications for health promotion [J].
Chinn, DJ ;
White, M ;
Harland, J ;
Drinkwater, C ;
Raybould, S .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (03) :191-192
[9]   Prevalence of physical inactivity and its relation to social class in US adults: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 [J].
Crespo, CJ ;
Ainsworth, BE ;
Keteyian, SJ ;
Heath, GW ;
Smit, E .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1999, 31 (12) :1821-1827
[10]  
Dowler E, 2001, Public Health Nutr, V4, P701