Effects of heater surface orientation on the critical heat flux .1. An experimental evaluation of models for subcooled pool boiling

被引:49
作者
Brusstar, MJ [1 ]
Merte, H [1 ]
Keller, RB [1 ]
Kirby, BJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN, DEPT MECH ENGN & APPL MECH, GG BROWN LAB 2250, ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0017-9310(97)00076-8
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
An experimental study of boiling at high heat fluxes in low-velocity subcooled forced convection boiling is presented, demonstrating the effects of subcooling and buoyancy orientation on the critical heat flux (CHF) and the bubble residence time. At the low velocity of 0.04 m s(-1) used, the flow forces acting on the vapor are insignificant compared with buoyancy and the CHF behaves as in pool boiling, depending primarily on the orientation of the heater surface with respect to gravity. This dependence is related to the bubble residence time, which is found to be inversely proportional to the CHF for all heater orientations at a given operating condition. This relationship, that the product of the CHF and the corresponding bubble residence time is a constant, suggests that the mechanism for dryout is independent of the heater surface orientation, despite changes in the vapor departure velocity and the CHF with the orientation angle. Furthermore, increases in the bulk liquid subcooling substantially reduce the net rate of vapor generation such that the bubble residence times at the CHF are independent of subcooling. The work concludes by proposing the energy per unit area leaving the heater surface during the bubble residence time as the CHF mechanism, which is more generalized than the mechanism assumed in the macrolayer dryout models. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4007 / 4019
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A NOTE ON LATENT HEAT TRANSPORT IN NUCLEATE BOILING [J].
BANKOFF, SG .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1962, 8 (01) :63-65
[2]   EFFECTS OF BUOYANCY ON THE CRITICAL HEAT-FLUX IN FORCED-CONVECTION [J].
BRUSSTAR, MJ ;
MERTE, H .
JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS AND HEAT TRANSFER, 1994, 8 (02) :322-328
[3]  
GAERTNER RF, 1965, T ASME, V87, P17
[5]  
Iida Y., 1969, Bulletin of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, V12, P283, DOI 10.1299/jsme1958.12.283
[6]  
Ishigai S., 1966, B JSME, V9, P361, DOI 10.1299/jsme1958.9.361
[7]  
IVEY HJ, 1962, 137 UKAEA AEEWR
[8]   PRINCIPAL MECHANISM OF BOILING CRISIS IN POOL BOILING [J].
KATTO, Y ;
YOKOYA, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1968, 11 (06) :993-&
[9]  
Kirby D.B., 1965, CHEM ENG PROG S SER, V61, P238
[10]   POOL BOILING HEAT-TRANSFER .2. THICKNESS OF LIQUID MACROLAYER FORMED BENEATH VAPOR MASSES [J].
KUMADA, T ;
SAKASHITA, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1995, 38 (06) :979-987