Nutritional screening of older people in a sub-acute care facility in Australia and its relation to discharge outcomes

被引:108
作者
Visvanathan, R [1 ]
Penhall, R
Chapman, I
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Geriatr & Rehabil Med, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Med, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
sub-acute care; screening; under-nutrition; elderly; poor outcome;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afh078
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: to determine the prevalence of under-nutrition using brief screening methods and to determine the relation between these results and (1) those of a more standard nutritional assessment and (2) discharge outcomes. Design: prospective study. Subjects: 65 (21 males) patients older than 65 years. Setting: sub-acute care facility. Measurements: the Mini Nutritional Assessment, standard nutritional assessment, 'rapid screen' and discharge outcome. Results: the prevalence of under-nutrition was high, ranging from 35.4% to 43.1%, depending on the screening method used. Compared to the standard nutritional assessment the 'rapid screen' consisting of (1) body mass index <22 kg/m(2); and/or (2) reported weight loss of >7.5% over the previous 3 months and the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (at risk subjects (46% of total) further evaluated using standard nutritional assessment) had sensitivities of 78.6 and 89.5% and specificities of 97.3 and 87.5% respectively in diagnosing under-nutrition. Under-nourished patients as identified by the standard nutritional assessment (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017), the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017) and the rapid screen (56.5% (under-nourished) versus 21.4% (nourished); P = 0.004) were more likely to be discharged to an acute hospital or an accommodation with increased support (poor discharge outcomes) than nourished patients. Conclusion: all screening methods identified patients more likely to have a poor discharge outcome. The highly specific but less sensitive 'rapid screen' may be the best method in facilities with limited resources as it can be easily incorporated into nursing/medical admissions and avoids biochemical investigations in all patients. The more sensitive two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment is better if resources permit.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 265
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], JPEN J PARENTER ENTE, DOI DOI 10.1177/01860717700100101
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858
[3]  
Azad N, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V161, P511
[4]  
Barone L, 2003, J Nutr Health Aging, V7, P13
[5]   Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults [J].
Calle, EE ;
Thun, MJ ;
Petrelli, JM ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Heath, CW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (15) :1097-1105
[6]   DIETARY SUPPLEMENTATION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH FRACTURED NECK OF THE FEMUR [J].
DELMI, M ;
RAPIN, CH ;
BENGOA, JM ;
DELMAS, PD ;
VASEY, H ;
BONJOUR, JP .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8696) :1013-1016
[7]  
*DEP AGR DEP HHS, 1990, HOM GARD B, V232
[8]  
Guigoz Y, 1996, NUTR REV, V54, pS59
[9]  
KAMATH SK, 1986, J AM DIET ASSOC, V86, P203
[10]  
Laporte M, 2001, CAN J DIET PRACT RES, V62, P26