Interobserver and intraobserver variability in detection of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm with transesophageal echocardiography

被引:68
作者
Cabanes, L
Coste, J
Derumeaux, G
Jeanrenaud, X
Lamy, C
Zuber, M
Mas, JL
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, Serv Cardiol, F-75674 Paris, France
[2] Hop Cochin, Serv Biostat & Informat Med, F-75674 Paris, France
[3] Hop Charles Nicolle, Serv Cardiol, Rouen, France
[4] CHU Vaudois, Serv Cardiol, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mje.2002.116718
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: An accurate diagnosis of patent foramen ovate (PFO) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) may be of decisional importance in the management of patients with ischemic stroke. Very few studies have been devoted to observer agreement in the diagnosis of these atrial septum abnormalities using contrast transesophageal echocardiography, which is considered as the method of choice for the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis of PFO and ASA with contrast echocardiography. Methods: Three sonographers independently reviewed 100 contrast studies stored on videotape on 2 occasions each. The interobserver and intraobserver variability was assessed by calculating kappa statistics. Results: The overall interobserver and intraobserver kappa values for the assessment of degree of shunting through a PFO were 0.77 (first and second reading) and 0.82, respectively. The best kappa statistics were obtained when no and small shunts (less than 10 microbubbles) were pooled and compared with larger shunts. For the diagnosis of ASA, the overall interobserver kappa value was 0.45 for the first reading and 0.71 for the second reading, whereas the overall intraobserver kappa value was 0.74. Conclusion: Interobserver and intraobserver agreements for the diagnosis of PFO and ASA by transesophageal echocardiography are not perfect and need to be improved, particularly for ASA. This variability has to be taken into account when deciding on a potential risky treatment to prevent recurrent strokes.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 446
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]   ATRIAL SEPTAL ANEURYSM AND PATENT FORAMEN OVALE AS RISK-FACTORS FOR CRYPTOGENIC STROKE IN PATIENTS LESS-THAN 55 YEARS OF AGE - A STUDY USING TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY [J].
CABANES, L ;
MAS, JL ;
COHEN, A ;
AMARENCO, P ;
CABANES, PA ;
OUBARY, P ;
CHEDRU, F ;
GUERIN, F ;
BOUSSER, MG ;
DERECONDO, J .
STROKE, 1993, 24 (12) :1865-1873
[3]   INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY IN DETECTION OF PATENT FORAMEN OVALE WITH CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY [J].
CROSS, SJ ;
THOMSON, LF ;
EVANS, SA ;
LEE, HS ;
JENNINGS, KP .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (03) :388-390
[4]  
Fleiss JL, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
[5]   IDENTIFICATION OF PATENT FORAMEN OVALE PERMITTING PARADOXIC EMBOLISM [J].
HAUSMANN, D ;
MUGGE, A ;
DANIEL, WG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 26 (04) :1030-1038
[6]   CHARACTERISTICS OF PATENT FORAMEN OVALE ASSOCIATED WITH CRYPTOGENIC STROKE - A BIPLANE TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDY [J].
HOMMA, S ;
DITULLIO, MR ;
SACCO, RL ;
MIHALATOS, D ;
MANDRI, GL ;
MOHR, JP .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (03) :582-586
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[8]   PREVALENCE OF PATENT FORAMEN OVALE IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE [J].
LECHAT, P ;
MAS, JL ;
LASCAULT, G ;
LORON, P ;
THEARD, M ;
KLIMCZAC, M ;
DROBINSKI, G ;
THOMAS, D ;
GROSGOGEAT, Y .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (18) :1148-1152
[9]   Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. [J].
Mas, JL ;
Arquizan, C ;
Lamy, C ;
Zuber, M ;
Cabanes, L ;
Derumeaux, G ;
Coste, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (24) :1740-1746
[10]   Diagnosis and management of paradoxical embolism and patent foramen ovale [J].
Mas, JL .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 11 (05) :519-524