Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies:: an ESS analysis

被引:152
作者
Wenseleers, T [1 ]
Helanterä, H
Hart, A
Ratnieks, FLW
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Lab Apiculture & Social Insects, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
eusocial Hymenoptera; kin selection; self-policing; social policing; tragedy of the commons; worker policing; worker reproduction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00751.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Insect societies are vulnerable to exploitation by workers who reproduce selfishly rather than help to rear the queen's offspring. In most species, however, only a small proportion of the workers reproduce. Here, we develop an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) model to investigate factors that could explain these observed low levels of reproductive exploitation. Two key factors are identified: relatedness and policing. Relatedness affects the ESS proportion of reproductive workers because laying workers generally work less, leading to greater inclusive fitness costs when within-colony relatedness is higher. The second key factor is policing. In many species, worker-laid eggs are selectively removed or 'policed' by other workers or the queen. We show that policing not only prevents the rearing of worker-laid eggs but can also make it unprofitable for workers to lay eggs in the first place. This can explain why almost no workers reproduce in species with efficient policing, such as honeybees, Apis, and the common wasp, Vespula vulgaris, despite relatively low relatedness caused by multiple mating of the mother queen. Although our analyses focus on social insects, the conclusion that both relatedness and policing can reduce the incentive for cheating applies to other biological systems as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1047
页数:13
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution of social insect colonies, DOI [10.2307/3495984, DOI 10.2307/3495984]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, SOCIAL BEHAV BEES CO
[4]   Worker reproduction in honey-bees (Apis) and the anarchic syndrome:: a review [J].
Barron, AB ;
Oldroyd, BP ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2001, 50 (03) :199-208
[5]   Reproductive conflicts in social animals: who has power? [J].
Beekman, M ;
Komdeur, J ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (06) :277-282
[6]  
BOURKE A.F.G., 1995, Social evolution in ants
[7]   Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects [J].
Bourke, AFG .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1999, 12 (02) :245-257
[8]   Kin conflict over caste determination in social Hymenoptera [J].
Bourke, AFG ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1999, 46 (05) :287-297
[9]   WORKER REPRODUCTION IN THE HIGHER EUSOCIAL HYMENOPTERA [J].
BOURKE, AFG .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1988, 63 (03) :291-311
[10]  
Bourke Andrew F.G., 1997, P203