An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations

被引:109
作者
Liao, Huchang [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [1 ]
Zeng, Xiao-Jun [2 ]
Xu, Dong-Ling [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision making; Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation; Consensus reaching process; Multiplicative consistency; MULTIPLICATIVE CONSISTENCY; MODELS; AGGREGATION; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.024
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Group decision making (GDM) with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) has been an important and active research topic recently, in which one of the most challenging issues is how to reach the group consensus so as to get the best decision. As the uniform consensus is often unachievable in practice, in order to achieve the consensus, the existing method needs to remove the experts with the most different opinions from the decision group. It has two drawbacks: the first is the loss of the valuable judgments and opinions of the removed experts. This is especially harmful in practice where most experts or decision makers often have the biased knowledge in the sense of in-depth expertise in some aspects and naive views in other aspects. The second is demotivating the experts in GDM. To overcome these weaknesses in the existing method, this paper presents an enhanced consensus reaching process for GDM with IFPRs, which only removes some opinions of an expert for alternative(s) instead of removing the expert from the decision group. A numerical example concerning the selection of outstanding PhD students for China Scholarship Council is given to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the enhanced consensus reaching process. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 286
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Group aggregation of pairwise comparisons using multi-objective optimization
    Abel, Edward
    Mikhailov, Ludmil
    Keane, John
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 322 : 257 - 275
  • [2] Atanassov K., 1983, 7 ITKRS SESS JUN
  • [3] Atanassov KT, 2012, STUD FUZZ SOFT COMP, V283, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29127-2
  • [4] A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making
    Chiclana, F.
    Tapia Garcia, J. M.
    del Moral, M. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 221 : 110 - 123
  • [5] Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Alonso, Sergio
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 (01) : 14 - 23
  • [6] FUZZY RATIONALITY MEASURES
    CUTELLO, V
    MONTERO, J
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1994, 62 (01) : 39 - 54
  • [7] Minimizing adjusted simple terms in the consensus reaching process with hesitant linguistic assessments in group decision making
    Dong, Yucheng
    Chen, Xia
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 297 : 95 - 117
  • [8] Terminological difficulties in fuzzy set theory - The case of "Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets"
    Dubois, D
    Gottwald, S
    Hajek, P
    Kacprzyk, J
    Prade, H
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2005, 156 (03) : 485 - 491
  • [9] The optimal priority models of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and their application in selecting industries with higher meteorological sensitivity
    Gong, Zai-Wu
    Li, Lian-Shui
    Forrest, Jeffrey
    Zhao, Yue
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) : 4394 - 4402
  • [10] Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations
    Gong, Zai-Wu
    Li, Lian-Shui
    Zhou, Fei-Xue
    Yao, Tian-Xiang
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 57 (04) : 1187 - 1193