Effects of Atorvastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus Among Kidney Transplant Recipients

被引:7
作者
Wanitchanont, A. [1 ,5 ]
Somparn, P. [2 ,4 ]
Vadcharavivad, S. [3 ]
Chancharoenthana, W. [1 ,5 ]
Townamchai, N. [1 ,5 ]
Praditpornsilpa, K. [1 ,5 ]
Avihingsanon, Y. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Div Nephrol, Dept Med, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Immunol Unit, Dept Microbiol, Fac Med, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[4] Chulalongkorn Univ, Ctr Excellence Immune Dis & Immune Mediated Dis, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[5] King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Thai Red Cross Soc, Excellent Ctr Organs Transplantat, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
CYCLOSPORINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.121
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Hyperlipidemia occurs in up to 50% of kidney transplant (KT) recipients who take everolimus (EVL). As a result of this, statins are the most commonly prescribed lipid-lowering drugs among these patients. However, we are concerned whether there are any drug interactions between EVL and statins, because both of these drugs use the same pharmacokinetics pathway. Therefore, we assessed the effects of concomitant use of EVL and atorvastatin. Methods. In this randomized, open-label, crossover study, 20 KT patients were assigned (1:1) to receive EVL with or without 20 mg atorvastatin for 1 month. One-month washout period was used before crossover. Plasma EVL concentrations were measured by homogeneous particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay. Twelve-hour area under the time-concentration curve (AUC(0-12)) of EVL was calculated with the use of whole-blood EVL concentrations from 10 different time points (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours). Results. The mean (SD) AUC(0-12) for EVL and EVL plus atorvastatin was 155.9 (41.6) ng.h/mL and 151.3 (51.4) ng.h/mL, respectively (P > .05; paired t test). No difference of EVL Cmax or Tmax was found after atorvastatin coadministration. Even though the EVL AUC(0-12) levels were not affected by atorvastatin coadministration in one-half of the subjects, for the rest of the patients, there were unpredictable changes in the EVL AUC(0-12) levels. This may be due to the high intrapatient variability of EVL drug concentration (coefficient of variation ranges from 9.8% to 34.1%). Conclusions. Coadministration of atorvastatin with EVL in KT recipients did not affect the pharmacokinetics of EVL.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 421
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Effect of sirolimus on the metabolism of ApoB100-containing lipoproteins in renal transplant patients [J].
Hoogeveen, RC ;
Ballantyne, CM ;
Pownall, HJ ;
Opekun, AR ;
Hachey, DL ;
Jaffe, JS ;
Oppermann, S ;
Kahan, BD ;
Morrisett, JD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (07) :1244-1250
[2]   Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors when coadministered with everolimus [J].
Kovarik, JM ;
Hartmann, S ;
Hubert, M ;
Berthier, S ;
Schneider, W ;
Rosenkranz, B ;
Rordorf, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 42 (02) :222-228
[3]   Population pharmacokinetics of everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients: Impact of ethnicity and comedications [J].
Kovarik, JM ;
Hsu, CH ;
McMahon, L ;
Berthier, S ;
Rordorf, C .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 70 (03) :247-254
[4]   Longitudinal assessment of everolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients over the first post-transplant year: Pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and influence on cyclosporine [J].
Kovarik, JM ;
Kahan, BD ;
Kaplan, B ;
Lorber, M ;
Winkler, M ;
Rouilly, M ;
Gerbeau, C ;
Cambon, N ;
Boger, R ;
Rordorf, C .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (01) :48-56
[5]  
Nankivell Brian J., 2003, New England Journal of Medicine, V349, P2326, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa020009
[6]   The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology [J].
Racusen, LC ;
Solez, K ;
Colvin, RB ;
Bonsib, SM ;
Castro, MC ;
Cavallo, T ;
Croker, BP ;
Demetris, AJ ;
Drachenberg, CB ;
Fogo, AB ;
Furness, P ;
Gaber, LW ;
Gibson, IW ;
Glotz, D ;
Goldberg, JC ;
Grande, J ;
Halloran, PF ;
Hansen, HE ;
Hartley, B ;
Hayry, PJ ;
Hill, CM ;
Hoffman, EO ;
Hunsicker, LG ;
Lindblad, AS ;
Marcussen, N ;
Mihatsch, MJ ;
Nadasdy, T ;
Nickerson, P ;
Olsen, TS ;
Papadimitriou, JC ;
Randhawa, PS ;
Rayner, DC ;
Roberts, I ;
Rose, S ;
Rush, D ;
Salinas-Madrigal, L ;
Salomon, DR ;
Sund, S ;
Taskinen, E ;
Trpkov, K ;
Yamaguchi, Y .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 55 (02) :713-723
[7]   Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients [J].
Vitko, S ;
Margreiter, R ;
Weimar, W ;
Dantal, J ;
Viljoen, HG ;
Li, YL ;
Jappe, A ;
Cretin, N .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (10) :1532-1540
[8]   Everolimus with optimized cyclosporine dosing in renal transplant recipients: 6-month safety and efficacy results of two randomized studies [J].
Vitko, S ;
Tedesco, H ;
Eris, J ;
Pascual, J ;
Whelchel, J ;
Magee, JC ;
Campbell, S ;
Civati, G ;
Bourbigot, B ;
Alves, G ;
Leone, J ;
Garcia, VD ;
Rigotti, P ;
Esmeraldo, R ;
Cambi, V ;
Haas, T ;
Jappe, A ;
Bernhardt, P ;
Geissler, J ;
Cretin, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (04) :626-635