A new dynamic two-parameter mixed model for large-eddy simulation

A new dynamic subgrid-scale (SGS) mixed model is proposed for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. This model is based on the decomposition of the SGS stress terms into the modified Leonard, modified cross and modified SGS Reynolds stress terms. In this model, the modified Leonard term is computed explicitly. The modified cross term and modified SGS Reynolds stress are assumed to be proportional to a new term, the form of which is comparable to the generalized central moment, derived as an extension of the filtered Bardina model proposed by Horiuti [J. Phys. Sec. Jpn. 66, 91 (1997)]. Using a linear combination of this new term with the Smagorinsky model for the modified SGS Reynolds stress, the proposed model contains two model parameters, which are computed dynamically. Two formulations for the test-filtered SGS stress reported by Zang et al. [Phys. Fluids A 5, 3186 (1993)] and Vreman et al. [Phys. Fluids 6, 4057 (1994)] are compared, and the compatibility of the SGS models with the standard dynamic SGS model procedure is discussed. The proposed model is assessed for incompressible channel and mixing layer flows, in comparison with the dynamic Smagorinsky model of Germane et al. [Phys. Fluids A 3, 1760 (1991)], the dynamic mixed model of Zang et al. and the dynamic two-parameter mixed model of Salvetti and Banerjee [Phys. Fluids 7, 2831 (1995)]. In the ''a priori'' test, the proposed model gave the closest agreement with the modified cross term as well as the modified SGS Reynolds stress term. It is shown that the proposed term represents a more general model of the SGS stress than the modified Leonard term and yields a more accurate approximation. These SGS models are tested further in actual LES of channel and mixing layer flows (''a posteriori'' test). The results were consistent with those of the ''a priori'' tests; the proposed model yielded the most accurate results. In the proposed model, the SGS quantities were predominantly represented using the new term, and the contribution of the Smagorinsky model was minimal. The two parameters contained in the model were determined locally in space on a point-by-point basis. (C) 1997 American Institute of Physics.