Fluorescent in situ hybridization study of c-myc oncogene copy number in prostate cancer

被引:7
作者
Mark, HFL [1 ]
Samy, M [1 ]
Santoro, K [1 ]
Mark, S [1 ]
Feldman, D [1 ]
机构
[1] KRAM Corp, Barrington, RI 02806 USA
关键词
copy number; c-myc; FISH; fluorescent in situ hybridization; oncogene; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1006/exmp.1999.2282
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
We previously conducted a study of 88 cases of prostate cancer in an attempt to identify potential prognostic biomarkers that can distinguish aggressive cases that must be treated immediately. Prostate cancer is a serious disease affecting men worldwide and compromises the quality of Life of its patients. Biomarkers studied included chromosome 7 trisomy, chromosome 8 trisomy, and HER-2/neu oncogene amplification. These biomarkers were initially studied because trisomy 8 and oncogene amplification of the HER-2/neu gene have been reported in many other cancers, including those studied in this laboratory. In view of the fact that HER-2/neu amplification was not found to play a prominent role in the group of prostate cancer specimens that we studied, an exploration of other biomarkers was felt to be warranted. Thus, we began a pilot study of c-myc oncogene copy number in prostate cancer using the same protocol for fluorescent in situ hybridization and a direct-labeled SpectrumOrange LSI c-myc probe (Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, TL) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. From a total of 36 cases of prostate cancers successfully analyzed, we found 11 (31%) tumors exhibiting 3 or more positive signals for c-myc in 15% or more of the cells. Of these, only 7 tumors (19% of the total cases studied) had greater than or equal to 3 signals in 20% or more of the cells. No case had greater than or equal to 3 signals in 25% or more of the cells. Compared to other molecular probes tested, the c-myc signals were more faint and the quality of the preparation was less optimal than other tumor specimens that we previously studied. Based on the information available thus far, we conclude that an increased copy number in c-myc oncogene copy number was not a prominent finding in our cohort of prostate cancer patients. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of chromosome 8 copy number in stage I and stage II infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast
    Afify, A
    Mark, HFL
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1997, 97 (02) : 101 - 105
  • [2] Fluorescent in situ hybridization assessment of chromosome 8 copy number in breast cancer
    Afify, A
    Bland, KI
    Mark, HFL
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 38 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [3] HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in stage I and stage III ovarian papillary serous carcinoma
    Afify, AM
    Werness, BA
    Mark, HFL
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 1999, 66 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [4] HER-2/NEU IN NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER - PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF OVEREXPRESSION INFLUENCED BY THE PRESENCE OF INSITU CARCINOMA
    ALLRED, DC
    CLARK, GM
    TANDON, AK
    MOLINA, R
    TORMEY, DC
    OSBORNE, CK
    GILCHRIST, KW
    MANSOUR, EG
    ABELOFF, M
    EUDEY, L
    MCGUIRE, WL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (04) : 599 - 605
  • [5] [Anonymous], CHROMOSOMES HUMAN CA
  • [6] BLAND I, 1995, ANN SURG, V222, pR2
  • [7] ONCOGENE PROTEIN COEXPRESSION - VALUE OF HA-RAS, C-MYC, C-FOS, AND P53 AS PROGNOSTIC DISCRIMINANTS FOR BREAST-CARCINOMA
    BLAND, KI
    KONSTADOULAKIS, MM
    VEZERIDIS, MP
    WANEBO, HJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (06) : 706 - 720
  • [8] CARTER HB, 1998, CAMPBELLS UROLOGY
  • [9] PREDICTION OF RELAPSE OR SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER BY DNA FLOW-CYTOMETRY
    CLARK, GM
    DRESSLER, LG
    OWENS, MA
    POUNDS, G
    OLDAKER, T
    MCGUIRE, WL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (10) : 627 - 633
  • [10] FIELD JK, 1990, ANTICANCER RES, V10, P1