Developments in the treatment of cancer pain in Finland: The third nation-wide survey

被引:14
作者
Kaasalainen, V
Vainio, A
AliMelkkila, T
机构
[1] LAHTI CENT HOSP, DEPT ANESTHESIOL, FIN-15800 LAHTI, FINLAND
[2] UNIV HELSINKI HOSP, DEPT ONCOL, FIN-00290 HELSINKI, FINLAND
[3] MCGILL UNIV, ROYAL VICTORIA HOSP, DEPT ANESTHESIA, MONTREAL, PQ H3A 1A1, CANADA
关键词
analgesic therapy; cancer pain; analgesic ladder; palliative treatment; morphine prescription; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; OXYCODONE; EFFICACY; MORPHINE; OPIOIDS; RELIEF; FRANCE;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03317-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This survey was designed to investigate the current status of the management of cancer pain in Finland. In 1995 a questionnaire was randomly sent to 5% (n = 546) of Finnish physicians, excluding specialists not expected to treat cancer patients. Two previous surveys, using the same questionnaire, were conducted in 1985 and 1990 by Vainio. The response rate was 53%. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents treated one or less than one cancer patient a week. Sixty-seven percent of them assessed the severity of cancer pain in their patients as being at least moderate. In 10 years, the proportion of physicians suggesting the WHO analgesic ladder principle to their 'typical cancer patient' had increased from 12% to 28%. At the same time, the suggestions of 'analgesic' without definition had decreased from 48% to 6%. Three simulated patient cases were presented. The mean daily dose of opioids suggested for severe terminal cancer pain corresponded to 72 (18-300) mg of intramuscular morphine in 1995, being only 39 (1-77) mg in 1985 for the same simulated patient case. Continuous infusion of opioid was recommended by 59% of the respondents. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as the treatment of choice for bone metastases pain in a patient with breast cancer, was recommended by 63% of the respondents. In the case of local severe pain due to recurrent rectal cancer, 68% of the physicians suggested anaesthetic intervention. Insufficient pain relief and lack of experience were the most common difficulties in pain management. Only one-third of the physicians thought that they had enough time and ability to give sufficient psychological support to their patients. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AHONEN R, 1993, THESIS U KUOPIO, P40
[2]  
[Anonymous], PAIN CLIN J
[3]  
BEAVER WT, 1978, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V207, P92
[4]  
Bonica JJ., 1990, MANAGEMENT PAIN, P197
[5]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS FOR CANCER PAIN - A METAANALYSIS [J].
EISENBERG, E ;
BERKEY, CS ;
CARR, DB ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (12) :2756-2765
[6]   THE EFFICACY OF OPIOIDS IN CANCER PAIN SYNDROMES [J].
FITZGIBBON, DR ;
GALER, BS .
PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) :429-431
[7]  
FOLEY KM, 1994, PROG PAIN RES MANAG, V2, P59
[8]   MISCONCEPTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES REGARDING THE USE OF OPIOIDS IN CANCER PAIN [J].
FOLEY, KM .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 1995, 6 :4-13
[9]  
Glajchen M, 1995, Cancer Pract, V3, P76
[10]  
Hanks GW, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P823