Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation

被引:27
作者
Siemonsma, PC [1 ]
Walker, MF [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NOTTINGHAM,CITY HOSP,STROKE RES UNIT,DIV STROKE MED,NOTTINGHAM NG5 1PB,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1177/026921559701100402
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 [康复医学与理疗学];
摘要
Objective: To provide guidelines for conducting independent assessments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. The article aims to assist those who plan to put independent assessment into practice and to be an introduction for those who are new to independent assessment. Issues: Possible causes of unblinding to group allocation are discussed, such as unblinding by other people, the environment, patients and assessors themselves. Other issues discussed in this paper are bias during assessment and monitoring levels of unblinding. Conclusion: The importance of monitoring levels of unblinding is stressed. Although it may not be possible to always keep an assessor blind in RCTs of rehabilitation, we should strive for perfection. It is therefore advocated that levels of unblinding should be reported.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
BIAS IN TREATMENT ASSIGNMENT IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
CELANO, P ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (22) :1358-1361
[2]
CHESSON R, 1993, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V79, P711
[3]
DRUMMOND A, 1994, BR J OCCUP THER, V57, P303
[4]
DRUMMOND A, 1990, CLIN REHABIL, V4, P255
[5]
EBRAHIM S, 1990, CLIN REHABIL, V4, P95
[6]
Fleiss JL., 1981, MEASUREMENT INTERRAT
[7]
GARRAWAY WM, 1977, HLTH B EDINB, V35, P131
[8]
HOWIE J, 1983, DO IT, P88
[9]
The effect of a stroke rehabilitation unit on functional and psychological outcome: A randomised controlled trial [J].
Juby, LC ;
Lincoln, NB ;
Berman, P .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1996, 6 (02) :106-110
[10]
LINCOLN NB, 1990, CLIN REHABIL, V4, P91