Cardiovascular stability during haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration

Several comparative studies have claimed that procedures based substantially or exclusively on pressure-driven water-solute transport, such as haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration, afford better protection of the cardiovascular tolerance to fluid removal than conventional haemodialysis. During each depurative modality, several factors are set in motion that might impact, each in its own right, upon the haemodynamic response to fluid withdrawal. To explore the haemodynamic effect of each of them singularly, one needs to keep all other components unvaried. However, this is very difficult to accomplish. For instance, to confirm the alleged greater protection of cardiovascular stability by pure convection vs diffusion, one needs to keep unvaried all the other factors potentially affecting haemodynamic tolerance, i.e. the rate of body fluid removal, the membrane, the buffer, the blood temperature in the extracorporeal circuit, depuration efficiency, the sodium balance, the fluid sterility and so on. Such studies are still awaited. However, clinical trials published to date have not resolved the question of whether haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration provide a better haemodynamic tolerance to fluid removal. If we limit our consideration to controlled trials only, most prospective studies have adopted a cross-over design implemented on very small patient samples and for very short periods. Such an approach is liable to generate misleading results because the incidence of dialysis hypotension often fluctuates from time to time. Owing to such fluctuations, results can be strongly affected by the 'order effect' of the cross-over from one technique to the other. The negative results provided by parallel comparisons of procedures should be taken with caution because patients samples did not include a suitable proportion of unstable patients.