Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection

被引:129
作者
Tran, TS [1 ]
Jamulitrat, S [1 ]
Chongsuvivatwong, V [1 ]
Geater, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Hungvuong Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Postoperat Dept, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00540-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine postcesarean complications and identify independent risk factors for surgical site infection. Methods: We studied a cohort of 969 women delivered by cesarean between May and August 1997. Infections were determined by examinations during ward rounds, reviews of laboratory results, and follow-up for 30 days after discharge. Risk factors were identified by multiple logistic regression. Results: Surgical complications were rare. There were febrile morbidity and infection complications in 16.2% and 12.4%,of subjects, respectively. Eighty-five subjects had 95 surgical:site infections (9.8%), and seven risk factors were independently associated with infection. Risk factors included preoperative remote infection (adjusted odd ratio [OR] 16.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1, 128.3); chorioamnionitis (OR 10.6, 95% CI 2.1, 54.2); maternal preoperative condition (OR 5.3 for those with severe systemic disease [American Society of Anesthesiologists score greater than or equal to 3], 95% CI 1.2, 24.0); preeclampsia (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1, 4.9); higher body mass index (OR 2.0 for every five-unit increment, 95% CI 1.3, 3.0); nulliparity (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1, 3.2); and increased surgical blood loss (OR 1.3 for every 100-mL increment, 95% CI 1.1, 1.5). Conclusion: Host susceptibility and existing infections were important predictors of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery. Further intervention should target this high-risk group to reduce the clinical effect of surgical site infection. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:367-71. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 371
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BASKETT TF, 1981, CAN MED ASSOC J, V125, P723
[2]  
CHANG PL, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P117
[3]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P627
[4]  
DINSMOOR MJ, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V74, P299
[5]  
EISENKOP SM, 1982, OBSTET GYNECOL, V60, P591
[6]   POSTOPERATIVE WOUND-INFECTION AT A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN JEDDAH, SAUDI-ARABIA [J].
ELTAHAWY, ATA ;
MOKHTAR, AA ;
KHALAF, RMF ;
BAHNASSY, AA .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1992, 21 (01) :79-83
[7]  
EMMONS SL, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P559
[8]   PREDICTORS OF INTRAOPERATIVE-ACQUIRED SURGICAL WOUND INFECTIONS [J].
GARIBALDI, RA ;
CUSHING, D ;
LERER, T .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1991, 18 :289-298
[9]   CDC DEFINITIONS FOR NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS, 1988 [J].
GARNER, JS ;
JARVIS, WR ;
EMORI, TG ;
HORAN, TC ;
HUGHES, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1988, 16 (03) :128-140
[10]   UNDERESTIMATION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION-RATES IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY [J].
GRAVELTROPPER, D ;
OXLEY, C ;
MEMISH, Z ;
GARBER, GE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1995, 23 (01) :22-26