Backup capacity coordination with renewable energy certificates in a regional electricity market

被引:4
作者
Zhou, Yingjue [1 ]
Liu, Tieming [2 ]
Zhao, Chaoyue [2 ]
机构
[1] Sears Holdings Corp, Hoffman Estates, IL USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Sch Ind Engn & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Renewable portfolio standard; renewable energy certificate; regional electricity market; game theory; coordination contract; WIND GENERATION; POWER; STORAGE; OPTIMIZATION; VARIABILITY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1080/24725854.2018.1440672
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
120111 [工业工程];
摘要
This article studies a coordination mechanism between a renewable energy supplier and a conventional supplier in a regional electricity market. The intermittent nature of the renewable supplier results in random power shortages. Though the renewable supplier can buy backup power from a conventional supplier who prepares backup capacity to cover the shortage, there is no commitment that enough backup capacity will be prepared without any incentives to the conventional supplier. We design a coordination mechanism where the renewable supplier offers the conventional supplier Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) proportional to the backup capacity committed. We prove that this mechanism coordinates the conventional supplier's decision on backup capacity and can arbitrarily split the system profit between the two suppliers. Our analytical results show that when the shortage cost increases, the backup capacity increases, the REC offering rate increases, the total profit decreases, and the renewable supplier's profit decreases but the conventional supplier's profit increases. We also show analytically that the social welfare under this mechanism is higher than in the decentralized case unless the regional environment is extremely sensitive to conventional power's carbon footprint, and the benefit of buffering power shortage cannot compensate for the damage to the environment.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 719
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
New CHP partnerships offering balancing of fluctuating renewable electricity productions [J].
Andersen, Anders N. ;
Lund, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (03) :288-293
[2]
Offering Strategy of Wind-Power Producer: A Multi-Stage Risk-Constrained Approach [J].
Baringo, Luis ;
Conejo, Antonio J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (02) :1420-1429
[3]
Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: An updated review [J].
Beaudin, Marc ;
Zareipour, Hamidreza ;
Schellenberglabe, Anthony ;
Rosehart, William .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 14 (04) :302-314
[4]
Attribution Mechanisms for Ancillary Service Costs Induced by Variability in Power Delivery [J].
Bona, Francesca ;
Gast, Nicolas ;
Le Boudec, Jean-Yves ;
Pinson, Pierre ;
Tomozei, Dan-Cristian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (03) :1891-1901
[5]
A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Wind Generation Variability on Electricity Markets [J].
Chattopadhyay, Deb ;
Alpcan, Tansu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (05) :2069-2077
[6]
Trading Wind Power in a Competitive Electricity Market Using Stochastic Programing and Game Theory [J].
Dai, Ting ;
Qiao, Wei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 4 (03) :805-815
[7]
Security-constrained unit commitment with wind generation and compressed air energy storage [J].
Daneshi, H. ;
Srivastava, A. K. .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2012, 6 (02) :167-175
[8]
Durkay Jocelyn., 2017, STATE RENEWABLE PORT
[9]
Fischer C, 2010, ENERG J, V31, P101
[10]
Stochastic joint optimization of wind generation and pumped-storage units in an electricity market [J].
Garcia-Gonzalez, Javier ;
Ruiz de la Muela, Rocio Moraga ;
Matres Santos, Luz ;
Mateo Gonzalez, Alicia .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) :460-468