Systems Resilience for Multihazard Environments: Definition, Metrics, and Valuation for Decision Making

被引:393
作者
Ayyub, Bilal M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Technol & Syst Management, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Community; consequence; infrastructure; measure; measurement; metrics; recovery; resilience; risk; robustness; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1111/risa.12093
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction reported that the 2011 natural disasters, including the earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan, resulted in $366billion in direct damages and 29,782 fatalities worldwide. Storms and floods accounted for up to 70% of the 302 natural disasters worldwide in 2011, with earthquakes producing the greatest number of fatalities. Average annual losses in the United States amount to about $55billion. Enhancing community and system resilience could lead to massive savings through risk reduction and expeditious recovery. The rational management of such reduction and recovery is facilitated by an appropriate definition of resilience and associated metrics. In this article, a resilience definition is provided that meets a set of requirements with clear relationships to the metrics of the relevant abstract notions of reliability and risk. Those metrics also meet logically consistent requirements drawn from measure theory, and provide a sound basis for the development of effective decision-making tools for multihazard environments. Improving the resiliency of a system to meet target levels requires the examination of system enhancement alternatives in economic terms, within a decision-making framework. Relevant decision analysis methods would typically require the examination of resilience based on its valuation by society at large. The article provides methods for valuation and benefit-cost analysis based on concepts from risk analysis and management.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 355
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CRIT INFR SEC RES PP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NAT EARTHQ RES RES I
[3]  
[Anonymous], SOC INDIC RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], DHS RISK LEX
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decisionmaking
[6]  
[Anonymous], NAT PREP PPD 8
[7]  
[Anonymous], RISK ANAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORKING PAPER
[9]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGY SOC
[10]  
[Anonymous], GRNAD CHALL DIS RED