Culture and negotiation

被引:100
作者
Brett, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, JL Kellogg Grad Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/002075900399385
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article develops a model of how culture affects negotiation processes and outcomes. It begins with a description of negotiation from a Western perspective: confrontational, focused on transactions or the resolution of disputes, evaluated in terms of integrative and distributive outcomes. It proposes that power and information processes are fundamental to negotiations and that one impact of culture on negotiations is through these processes. The cultural value of individualism versus collectivism is linked to goals in negotiation; the cultural value of egalitarianism versus hierarchy is linked to power in negotiation; and the cultural value for high versus low context communication is linked to information sharing in negotiation. The article describes why inter-cultural negotiations pose significant strategic challenges, but concludes that negotiators who are motivated to search for information, and are flexible about how that search is carried out, can reach high-quality negotiated outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Adair W., 1998, COMPATIBLE CULTURAL
[2]  
Adair W., 1998, CULTURE NEGOTIATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ESSENTIALS NEGOTIATI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, KISS BOW SHAKE HANDS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy
[6]  
Brett J. M., 1997, NEW PERSPECTIVES INT, P75
[7]  
Brett J. M., 1998, CULTURALLY BOUND NEG
[8]   Inter- and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators [J].
Brett, JM ;
Okumura, T .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (05) :495-510
[9]   Culture and joint gains in negotiation [J].
Brett, JM ;
Adair, W ;
Lempereur, A ;
Okumura, T ;
Shikhirev, P ;
Tinsley, C ;
Lytle, A .
NEGOTIATION JOURNAL-ON THE PROCESS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, 1998, 14 (01) :61-86
[10]   NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION [J].
CARNEVALE, PJ ;
PRUITT, DG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 43 :531-582