Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection

被引:512
作者
Walmsley, S
Bernstein, B
King, M
Arribas, J
Beall, G
Ruane, P
Johnson, M
Johnson, D
Lalonde, R
Japour, A
Brun, S
Sun, E
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Hop Univ La Paz, Serv VIH Med Interna 2, Madrid, Spain
[3] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
[4] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[5] Tower Infect Dis, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Royal Free Hosp, London NW3 2QG, England
[7] Royal Victoria Hosp, Montreal Chest Inst, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa012354
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lopinavir is a newly developed inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease that, when formulated with ritonavir, yields mean trough plasma lopinavir concentrations that are at least 75 times as high as that needed to inhibit replication of wild-type HIV by 50 percent. Methods: We conducted a double-blind trial in which 653 HIV-infected adults who had not received antiretroviral therapy for more than 14 days were randomly assigned to receive either lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg of lopinavir plus 100 mg of ritonavir twice daily) with nelfinavir placebo or nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily) with lopinavir-ritonavir placebo. All patients also received open-label stavudine and lamivudine. The primary efficacy end points were the presence of fewer than 400 HIV RNA copies per milliliter of plasma at week 24 and the time to the loss of virologic response through week 48. Results: At week 48, greater proportions of patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir than of patients treated with nelfinavir had fewer than 400 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter (75 percent vs. 63 percent, P<0.001) and fewer than 50 copies per milliliter (67 percent vs. 52 percent, P<0.001). The time to the loss of virologic response was greater in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than in the nelfinavir group (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.7; P<0.001). The estimated proportion of patients with a persistent virologic response through week 48 was 84 percent for patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir and 66 percent for those receiving nelfinavir. Both regimens were well tolerated, with the rate of discontinuation related to the study drugs at 3.4 percent among patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir and 3.7 percent among patients receiving nelfinavir. Among patients with more than 400 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter at some point from week 24 through week 48, resistance mutations in HIV protease were demonstrated in viral isolates from 25 of 76 nelfinavir-treated patients (33 percent) and none of 37 patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir (P<0.001). Conclusions: For the initial treatment of HIV-infected adults, a combination regimen that includes lopinavir-ritonavir is well tolerated and has antiviral activity superior to that of a nelfinavir-containing regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:2039 / 2046
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Indinavir concentrations and antiviral effect
    Acosta, EP
    Henry, K
    Baken, L
    Page, LM
    Fletcher, CV
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 19 (06): : 708 - 712
  • [2] Progress in hiv therapeutics and the challenges of adherence to antiretroviral therapy
    Andrews, L
    Friedland, G
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 14 (04) : 901 - +
  • [3] Correlation between human immunodeficiency virus genotypic resistance and virologic response in patients receiving nelfinavir monotherapy or nelfinavir with lamivudine and zidovudine
    Atkinson, B
    Isaacson, J
    Knowles, M
    Mazabel, E
    Patick, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 182 (02) : 420 - 427
  • [4] Nelfinavir - An update on its use in HIV infection
    Bardsley-Elliot, A
    Plosker, GL
    [J]. DRUGS, 2000, 59 (03) : 581 - 620
  • [5] Protease inhibitors in patients with HIV disease - Clinically important pharmacokinetic considerations
    Barry, M
    Gibbons, S
    Back, D
    Mulcahy, F
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 32 (03) : 194 - 209
  • [6] Bertz R, 2001, P 2 INT WORKSH CLIN
  • [7] CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.), 1992, MMWR RECOMM REP, V41, P1
  • [8] Drug resistance and predicted virologic responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor therapy
    Condra, JH
    Petropoulos, CJ
    Ziermann, R
    Schleif, WA
    Shivaprakash, M
    Emini, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 182 (03) : 758 - 765
  • [9] CONDRA JH, 1999, ANTIVIR THER S, V4, P44
  • [10] Importance of protease inhibitor plasma levels in HIV-infected patients treated with genotypic-guided therapy: pharmacological data from the Viradapt Study
    Durant, J
    Clevenbergh, P
    Garraffo, R
    Halfon, P
    Icard, S
    Del Giudice, P
    Montagne, N
    Schapiro, JM
    Dellamonica, P
    [J]. AIDS, 2000, 14 (10) : 1333 - 1339