Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations

被引:481
作者
Schulz, M. [1 ]
Textor, C.
Kinne, S.
Balkanski, Y.
Bauer, S.
Berntsen, T.
Berglen, T.
Boucher, O.
Dentener, F.
Guibert, S.
Isaksen, I. S. A.
Iversen, T.
Koch, D.
Kirkevag, A.
Liu, X.
Montanaro, V.
Myhre, G.
Penner, J. E.
Pitari, G.
Reddy, S.
Seland, O.
Stier, P.
Takemura, T.
机构
[1] CEA CNRS UVSQ, Lab Sci Climat & Environm, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Ctr Marine & Atmospher Sci ZMAW, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Columbia Univ, GISS, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
[5] Hadley Ctr, Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Climate Change Unit, European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] Univ Aquila, Dipartimento Fis, I-67010 Coppito, Italy
[9] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ USA
[10] Kyushu Univ, Appl Mech Res Inst, Fukuoka 8168580, Japan
[11] Univ Sci & Technol Lille, CNRS, Opt Atmospher Lab, Villeneuve Dascq, France
[12] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nine different global models with detailed aerosol modules have independently produced instantaneous direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic aerosols. The anthropogenic impact is derived from the difference of two model simulations with prescribed aerosol emissions, one for present-day and one for pre-industrial conditions. The difference in the solar energy budget at the top of the atmosphere (ToA) yields a new harmonized estimate for the aerosol direct radiative forcing (RF) under all-sky conditions. On a global annual basis RF is -0.22 Wm(-2), ranging from +0.04 to -0.41 Wm(-2), with a standard deviation of +/- 0.16 Wm(-2). Anthropogenic nitrate and dust are not included in this estimate. No model shows a significant positive all-sky RF. The corresponding clear-sky RF is -0.68 Wm(-2). The cloud-sky RF was derived based on all-sky and clear-sky RF and modelled cloud cover. It was significantly different from zero and ranged between -0.16 and +0.34 Wm(-2). A sensitivity analysis shows that the total aerosol RF is influenced by considerable diversity in simulated residence times, mass extinction coefficients and most importantly forcing efficiencies (forcing per unit optical depth). The clear-sky forcing efficiency (forcing per unit optical depth) has diversity comparable to that for the all-sky/clear-sky forcing ratio. While the diversity in clear-sky forcing efficiency is impacted by factors such as aerosol absorption, size, and surface albedo, we can show that the all-sky/clear-sky forcing ratio is important because all-sky forcing estimates require proper representation of cloud fields and the correct relative altitude placement between absorbing aerosol and clouds. The analysis of the sulphate RF shows that long sulphate residence times are compensated by low mass extinction coefficients and vice versa. This is explained by more sulphate particle humidity growth and thus higher extinction in those models where short-lived sulphate is present at lower altitude and vice versa. Solar atmospheric forcing within the atmospheric column is estimated at +0.82 +/- 0.17 Wm(-2). The local annual average maxima of atmospheric forcing exceed +5 Wm(-2) confirming the regional character of aerosol impacts on climate. The annual average surface forcing is -1.02 +/- 0.23 Wm(-2). With the current uncertainties in the modelling of the radiative forcing due to the direct aerosol effect we show here that an estimate from one model is not sufficient but a combination of several model estimates is necessary to provide a mean and to explore the uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:5225 / 5246
页数:22
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] General circulation model assessment of direct radiative forcing by the sulfate-nitrate-ammonium-water inorganic aerosol system
    Adams, PJ
    Seinfeld, JH
    Koch, D
    Mickley, L
    Jacob, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D1) : 1097 - 1111
  • [2] Climate forcing by aerosols - a hazy picture
    Anderson, TL
    Charlson, RJ
    Schwartz, SE
    Knutti, R
    Boucher, O
    Rodhe, H
    Heintzenberg, J
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5622) : 1103 - 1104
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, REPORT INTERGOVERNME
  • [4] BALKANSKI Y, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS DISC, V6, P8383
  • [5] A comparison of large-scale atmospheric sulphate aerosol models (COSAM):: overview and highlights
    Barrie, LA
    Yi, Y
    Leaitch, WR
    Lohmann, U
    Kasibhatla, P
    Roelofs, GJ
    Wilson, J
    McGovern, F
    Benkovitz, C
    Mélières, MA
    Law, K
    Prospero, J
    Kritz, M
    Bergmann, D
    Bridgeman, C
    Chin, M
    Christensen, J
    Easter, R
    Feichter, J
    Land, C
    Jeuken, A
    Kjellström, E
    Koch, D
    Rasch, P
    [J]. TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2001, 53 (05): : 615 - 645
  • [6] Impact of heterogeneous sulfate formation at mineral dust surfaces on aerosol loads and radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model
    Bauer, SE
    Koch, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2005, 110 (D17) : 91 - 105
  • [7] Global estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements
    Bellouin, N
    Boucher, O
    Haywood, J
    Reddy, MS
    [J]. NATURE, 2005, 438 (7071) : 1138 - 1141
  • [8] A global model of the coupled sulfur/oxidant chemistry in the troposphere: The sulfur cycle
    Berglen, TF
    Berntsen, TK
    Isaksen, ISA
    Sundet, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D19) : D193101 - 27
  • [9] A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion
    Bond, TC
    Streets, DG
    Yarber, KF
    Nelson, SM
    Woo, JH
    Klimont, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D14) : D14203
  • [10] History of sulfate aerosol radiative forcings
    Boucher, O
    Pham, M
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (09) : 22 - 23