Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index

被引:68
作者
Birkeland, K
Furevik, J
Boe, OE
Wisth, PJ
机构
[1] Department of Orthodontics, University of Bergen
[2] Department of Orthodontics, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/19.3.279
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
To assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment, 224 cases treated in a postgraduate clinic were evaluated. Pre-treatment (T-1), post-treatment (T-2) and 5-year follow-up (T-3) study casts were assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. The influence of various factors upon treatment and long-term outcome was analysed. According to the PAR Index, orthodontic treatment reduced the malocclusions on average by 76.7 per cent, and at follow-up the reduction was 63.8 per cent. Follow-up stability was good for 76.3 per cent of the cases. Some Gases (4.0 per cent) even improved, while moderate to severe post-treatment relapse occurred in 19.7 per cent of the cases. Orthodontic treatment changed Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions to near ideal occlusion (PAR scores 4.4-6.8). No long-term interaction between the groups was discovered. Sex and extraction/non-extraction treatments did not significantly affect the results. The initial PAR score accounted for 77.8 per cent of the variation in treatment PAR score change (T-1-T-2), and for 61.8 per cent of the variation of long-term PAR score change (T-1-T-3). Age at treatment start accounted significantly for the variability of treatment changes (P < 0.001). The PAR score at the end of treatment had some explanatory importance (R-2 = 0.099) for the long-term (T-1-T-3) result. However, PAR score changes in the follow-up period were difficult to predict.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 288
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
BERG R, 1991, ANGLE ORTHOD, V61, P261
[2]
Orthodontic concern among 11-year-old children and their parents compared with orthodontic treatment need assessed by Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need [J].
Birkeland, K ;
Boe, OE ;
Wisth, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 110 (02) :197-205
[3]
BJORK A, 1983, EUR J ORTHODONT, V5, P1
[4]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]
BRODIE A.G., 1953, Angle Orthod, V23, P146
[6]
THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDEX OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT PRIORITY [J].
BROOK, PH ;
SHAW, WC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1989, 11 (03) :309-320
[7]
Buchanan I B, 1993, Eur J Orthod, V15, P27
[8]
THE VALIDATION OF THE PEER ASSESSMENT RATING INDEX FOR MALOCCLUSION SEVERITY AND TREATMENT DIFFICULTY [J].
DEGUZMAN, L ;
BAHIRAEI, D ;
VIG, KWL ;
VIG, PS ;
WEYANT, RJ ;
OBRIEN, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (02) :172-176
[9]
A NEW NORWEGIAN INDEX OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT NEED RELATED TO ORTHODONTIC CONCERN AMONG 11-YEAR-OLDS AND THEIR PARENTS [J].
ESPELAND, LV ;
IVARSSON, K ;
STENVIK, A .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (05) :274-279
[10]
LONG-TERM STABILITY OF ANGLE CLASS-II, DIVISION-1 MALOCCLUSIONS WITH SUCCESSFUL OCCLUSAL RESULTS AT END OF ACTIVE TREATMENT [J].
FIDLER, BC ;
ARTUN, J ;
JOONDEPH, DR ;
LITTLE, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (03) :276-285