Harmonization vs. fragmentation: overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27

被引:46
作者
Blanford, Geoffrey J. [1 ]
Kriegler, Elmar [2 ]
Tavoni, Massimo [3 ]
机构
[1] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[3] FEEM, Milan, Italy
关键词
MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0951-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper synthesizes results of the multi-model Energy Modeling Forum 27 (EMF27) with a focus on climate policy scenarios. The study included two harmonized long-term climate targets of 450 ppm CO2-e (enforced in 2100) and 550 pm CO2-e (not-to-exceed) as well as two more fragmented policies based on national and regional emissions targets. Stabilizing atmospheric GHG concentrations at 450 and 550 ppm CO2-e requires a dramatic reduction of carbon emissions compared to baseline levels. Mitigation pathways for the 450 CO2-e target are largely overlapping with the 550 CO2-e pathways in the first half of the century, and the lower level is achieved through rapid reductions in atmospheric concentrations in the second half of the century aided by negative anthropogenic carbon flows. A fragmented scenario designed to extrapolate current levels of ambition into the future falls short of the emissions reductions required under the harmonized targets. In a more aggressive scenario intended to capture a break from observed levels of stringency, emissions are still somewhat higher in the second half due to unabated emissions from non-participating countries, emphasizing that a phase-out of global emissions in the long term can only be reached with full global participation. A key finding is that a large range of energy-related CO2 emissions can be compatible with a given long-term target, depending on assumptions about carbon cycle response, non-CO2 and land use CO2 emissions abatement, partly explaining the spread in mitigation costs.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 396
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG IN PRESS
  • [2] [Anonymous], TECHNOL FORECAST SOC
  • [3] Carbon-Concentration and Carbon-Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Boer, George J.
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Eby, Michael
    Jones, Chris D.
    Christian, James R.
    Bonan, Gordon
    Bopp, Laurent
    Brovkin, Victor
    Cadule, Patricia
    Hajima, Tomohiro
    Ilyina, Tatiana
    Lindsay, Keith
    Tjiputra, Jerry F.
    Wu, Tongwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (15) : 5289 - 5314
  • [4] Potential and limitations of bioenergy for low carbon transitions
    Bibas, Ruben
    Mejean, Aurelie
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) : 731 - 761
  • [5] Baseline projections of energy and emissions in Asia
    Blanford, Geoffrey J.
    Rose, Steven K.
    Tavoni, Massimo
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 : S284 - S292
  • [6] International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios
    Clarke, Leon
    Edmonds, Jae
    Krey, Volker
    Richels, Richard
    Rose, Steven
    Tavoni, Massimo
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S64 - S81
  • [7] Frankel Jeffrey., 2007, Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World, P31
  • [8] The benefits of climate change mitigation in integrated assessment models: the role of the carbon cycle and climate component
    Hof, Andries F.
    Hope, Chris W.
    Lowe, Jason
    Mastrandrea, Michael D.
    Meinshausen, Malte
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 113 (3-4) : 897 - 917
  • [9] Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action
    Jakob, Michael
    Luderer, Gunnar
    Steckel, Jan
    Tavoni, Massimo
    Monjon, Stephanie
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 114 (01) : 79 - 99
  • [10] Mitigation Costs in a Globalized World: Climate Policy Analysis with REMIND-R
    Leimbach, Marian
    Bauer, Nico
    Baumstark, Lavinia
    Edenhofer, Ottmar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (03) : 155 - 173