Benign regenerative nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome and other vascular disorders of the liver: Radiologic-pathologic and clinical correlation

被引:69
作者
Brancatelli, G
Federle, MP
Grazioli, L
Golferi, R
Lencioni, R
机构
[1] UPMC Presbyterian, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Palermo, I-90133 Palermo, Italy
[3] Univ Brescia, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Pisa, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Budd-Chiari syndrome; liver; blood supply; nodules; liver neoplasms; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl17847
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Large regenerative nodules are benign liver lesions that are frequently seen in Budd-Chiari syndrome and less commonly in other vascular disorders of the liver or systemic conditions such as autoimmune disease, myeloproliferative disorders, and lymphoproliferative disorders. They are usually multiple, with a typical diameter of 0.5-4 cm. At pathologic analysis, large regenerative nodules are well-circumscribed, round lesions that may distort the contour of the Ever. Only a minority of these nodules are detected at cross-sectional imaging. At multiphasic helical computed tomography, large regenerative nodules are markedly and homogeneously hyperattenuating on arterial dominant phase images and remain slightly hyperattenuating on portal venous phase images. Large regenerative nodules are bright on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images and show the same enhancement characteristics after intravenous bolus administration of gadolinium. contrast material. They are predominantly isointense or hypointense relative to the liver on T2-weighted images. There is no evidence that large regenerative nodules degenerate into malignancy. If these nodules are misdiagnosed as multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma, patients might be denied transplantation or offered inappropriately aggressive therapy such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Understanding the clinical setting and imaging appearance of large regenerative nodules can help avoid misdiagnosis as other hypervascular masses.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 862
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Hepatic vein obstruction in a case of focal nodular hyperplasia [J].
Arrivé, L ;
Dahan, H ;
Tubiana, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (03) :857-857
[2]
Diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia - Not so easy [J].
Bioulac-Sage, P ;
Balabaud, C ;
Wanless, IR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (10) :1322-1325
[3]
Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients [J].
Brancatelli, G ;
Federle, MP ;
Grazioli, L ;
Blachar, A ;
Peterson, MS ;
Thaete, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :61-68
[4]
Large regenerative nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome and other vascular disorders of the liver: CT and MR imaging findings with clinicopathologic correlation [J].
Brancatelli, G ;
Federle, MP ;
Grazioli, L ;
Golfieri, R ;
Lencioni, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (04) :877-883
[5]
Cazals-Hatem D, 2001, HEPATOLOGY, V34, p694A
[6]
NODULAR REGENERATIVE HYPERPLASIA OF THE LIVER AND THE BUDD-CHIARI SYNDROME - CASE-REPORT, REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND REAPPRAISAL OF PATHOGENESIS [J].
DESOUSA, JMM ;
PORTMANN, B ;
WILLIAMS, R .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1991, 12 (01) :28-35
[7]
Golfieri R, 2000, Radiol Med, V99, P233
[8]
Focal nodular hyperplasia: Morphologic and functional information from MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine [J].
Grazioli, L ;
Morana, G ;
Federle, MP ;
Brancatelli, G ;
Testoni, M ;
Kirchin, MA ;
Menni, K ;
Olivetti, L ;
Nicoli, N ;
Procacci, C .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) :731-739
[9]
Congenital absence of portal vein with nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver [J].
Grazioli, L ;
Alberti, D ;
Olivetti, L ;
Rigamonti, W ;
Codazzi, F ;
Matricardi, L ;
Fugazzola, C ;
Chiesa, A .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05) :820-825
[10]
Liver adenomatosis: clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings in 15 patients [J].
Grazioli, L ;
Federle, MP ;
Ichikawa, T ;
Balzano, E ;
Nalesnik, M ;
Madariaga, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) :395-402