Dual effects of phytoestrogens result in U-shaped dose-response curves

被引:123
作者
Almstrup, K
Fernández, MF
Petersen, JH
Olea, N
Skakkebaek, NE
Leffers, H
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Dept Growth & Reprod, Sect GR5064, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Granada, Hosp Clin San Cecilio, Lab Invest Med, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
aromatase inhibitors; endocrine disruptors; estrogenicity; phytoestrogens; U-shaped dose-response curves;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.02110743
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
Endocrine disruptors can affect the endocrine system without directly interacting with receptors, for example, by interfering with the synthesis or metabolism of steroid hormones. The aromatase that converts testosterone to 17beta-estradiol is a possible target. In this paper we describe an assay that simultaneously detects aromatase inhibition and estrogenicity. The principle is similar to that of other MCF-7 estrogenicity assays, but with a fixed amount of testosterone added. The endogenous aromatase activity in MCF-7 cells converts some of the testosterone to 17beta-estradiol, which is assayed by quantifying differences in the expression level of the estrogen-induced pS2 mRNA. Potential aromatase inhibitors can be identified by a dose-dependent reduction in the pS2 mRNA expression level after exposure to testosterone and the test compound. Using this assay, we have investigated several compounds, including synthetic chemicals and phytoestrogens, for aromatase inhibition. The phytoestrogens, except genistein, were aromatase inhibitors at low concentrations (< 1 mu M) but estrogenic at higher concentrations (>= 1 mu M), resulting in U-shaped dose-response curves. None of the tested synthetic chemicals were aromatase inhibitors. The low-dose aromatase inhibition distinguished phytoestrogens from other estrogenic compounds and may partly explain reports about antiestrogenic properties of phytoestrogens. Aromatase inhibition may play an important role in the protective effects of phytoestrogens against breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 748
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]
INHIBITION OF HUMAN AROMATASE BY MAMMALIAN LIGNANS AND ISOFLAVONOID PHYTOESTROGENS [J].
ADLERCREUTZ, H ;
BANNWART, C ;
WAHALA, K ;
MAKELA, T ;
BRUNOW, G ;
HASE, T ;
AROSEMENA, PJ ;
KELLIS, JT ;
VICKERY, LE .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 44 (02) :147-153
[2]
ARAIY, 2000, J EPIDEMIOL, V10, P127
[3]
Sex reversal and aromatase in the European pond turtle: Treatment with letrozole after the thermosensitive period for sex determination [J].
Belaid, B ;
Richard-Mercier, N ;
Pieau, C ;
Dorizzi, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY, 2001, 290 (05) :490-497
[4]
Aromatase inhibitors and their antitumor effects in model systems [J].
Brodie, A ;
Lu, Q ;
Liu, Y ;
Long, B .
ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 1999, 6 (02) :205-210
[5]
Androgens influence estrogen-induced responses in human breast carcinoma cells through cytochrome P450 aromatase [J].
Burak, WE ;
Quinn, AL ;
Farrar, WB ;
Brueggemeier, RW .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1997, 44 (01) :57-64
[6]
Phytochemical glyceollins, isolated from soy, mediate antihormonal effects through estrogen receptor α and β [J].
Burow, ME ;
Boue, SM ;
Collins-Burow, BM ;
Melnik, LI ;
Duong, BN ;
Carter-Wientjes, CH ;
Li, SF ;
Wiese, TE ;
Cleveland, TE ;
McLachlan, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2001, 86 (04) :1750-1758
[7]
FLAVONOID INHIBITION OF AROMATASE ENZYME-ACTIVITY IN HUMAN PREADIPOCYTES [J].
CAMPBELL, DR ;
KURZER, MS .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (03) :381-388
[8]
Rethinking breast cancer risk and the environment: The case for the precautionary principle [J].
Davis, DL ;
Axelrod, D ;
Bailey, L ;
Gaynor, M ;
Sasco, AJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 (09) :523-529
[9]
*DD BAS, 2002, MAN DIFF DISPL
[10]
The control and biological importance of intratumoural aromatase in breast cancer [J].
Dowsett, M ;
Lee, K ;
Macaulay, VM ;
Detre, S ;
Rowlands, M ;
Grimshaw, R .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 56 (1-6) :145-150