Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method

被引:104
作者
Boschian Pest, L.
Guidotti, S.
Pietrabissa, R.
Gagliani, M.
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, I-20100 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Fac Engn, Dept Bioengn, Milan, Italy
关键词
finite element method; posts; retention; luting material; mastication force;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01538.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Clinicians are opting ever more frequently for restorative materials which have an elastic modulus similar to that of dentin when reconstructing endodontically treated teeth. Metallic posts, which are capable of causing dangerous and non-homogenous stresses in root dentin, are slowly being abandoned. Ideal posts may be those made of various types of fibre (carbon, mineral and glass) and which are adhesively luted into the canal. Among the different methods for evaluating the mechanical behaviour of posts in root canals (progressive loads and photo-elastic technique) the finite element method (FEM) presents many advantages. The aim of this paper is to evaluate, utilizing three-dimensional analysis of the finite elements, what the effect of material rigidity, depth of insertion and post diameter could be on the stress distribution in the different components of the single tooth-post-core reconstruction unit. The results of the FEM analyses, expressed as the distribution of Von Mises stress values, has allowed us to conclude that (i) fibreglass-reinforced composite distributes stress better than titanium alloy or stainless steel; (ii) fibreglass-reinforced composite posts should be inserted as deeply as possible (but maintaining 5-6 mm of gutta-percha apical seal); (iii) fibreglass-reinforced composite post diameter does not affect stress distribution, therefore, as much radicular dentin as possible should be preserved.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 697
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts [J].
Albuquerque, RD ;
Polleto, LTD ;
Fontana, RHBTS ;
Cimini, CA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 30 (09) :936-943
[2]
BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN RESORTING ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH [J].
ASSIF, D ;
GORFIL, C .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (06) :565-567
[3]
EFFECT OF POST DESIGN ON RESISTANCE TO FRACTURE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH WITH COMPLETE CROWNS [J].
ASSIF, D ;
BITENSKI, A ;
PILO, R ;
OREN, E .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1993, 69 (01) :36-40
[4]
PHOTOELASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRESS TRANSFER BY ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH TO THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE USING DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES [J].
ASSIF, D ;
OREN, E ;
MARSHAK, BL ;
AVIV, I .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1989, 61 (05) :535-543
[5]
Prosthetic restoration after coronoradicular resection: Mechanical behavior of the distal root remaining and surrounding bone [J].
Augereau, D ;
Pierrisnard, L ;
Renault, P ;
Barquins, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (04) :467-473
[6]
A COMPARISON OF 3 RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR ENDODONTICALLY TREATED ANTERIOR TEETH [J].
BRANDAL, JL ;
NICHOLLS, JI ;
HARRINGTON, GW .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1987, 58 (02) :161-165
[7]
A COMPARISON OF INTRACANAL STRESSES IN A POST-RESTORED TOOTH UTILIZING THE FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD [J].
CAILLETEAU, JG ;
RIEGER, MR ;
AKIN, JE .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1992, 18 (11) :540-544
[8]
CAVALLI G, 1996, G IT ENDO, V3, P107
[9]
CAVALLI G, 1998, DENT CADMOS, V11, P9
[10]
Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis) [J].
Eskitascioglu, G ;
Belli, S ;
Kalkan, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (09) :629-633