Placement of long-term central venous catheters in outpatients: Study of 134 patients over 24,596 catheter days

被引:47
作者
Damascelli, B
Patelli, G
Frigerio, LF
Lanocita, R
Garbagnati, F
Marchiano, A
Spreafico, C
DiTolla, G
Monfardini, L
Porcelli, G
机构
[1] Dept. of Interventional Radiology, INSCT, 20133 Milano, 1, via Venezian
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129419
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
venous access devices in outpatients using a simple technique that minimizes the risks of complications linked to venipuncture and errors in management. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We placed 147 central venous catheters (CVCs) in 134 patients under local anesthesia. No sedation was used, and all procedures were done in our radiology department. Of the 134 patients, 101 patients were included in the follow-up. Overall follow-up of patients were 24,596 catheter days (mean, 243.52 days). Percutaneous access, mostly by the subclavian vein, was done by micropuncture technique under flouroscopic guidance. Six CVCs were untunneled, 36 were connected to totally subcutaneous ports, and 105 were tunneled. RESULTS. The only immediate complication was pneumothorax (3%). Late complica tions, expressed per 1000 catheter days, included CVC breakage (0.12), Vascular thrombosis (0.08), catheter occlusion (0.04), dislodgment (0.24), and local or systemic infections (0.40). CONCLUSION. Outpatient CVC placement is feasible because the procedure is not adversely affected when the patient is not hospitalized. The drawbacks are identical to those faced by inpatients. Improved materials and more extensive information on the management of patients with long-term CVCs would help reduce complications further.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1239
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE PINCH-OFF SIGN - A WARNING OF IMPENDING PROBLEMS WITH PERMANENT SUBCLAVIAN CATHETERS [J].
AITKEN, DR ;
MINTON, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 148 (05) :633-636
[2]   THROMBOSIS - THE MAJOR HICKMAN CATHETER COMPLICATION IN PATIENTS WITH SOLID TUMOR [J].
ANDERSON, AJ ;
KRASNOW, SH ;
BOYER, MW ;
CUTLER, DJ ;
JONES, BD ;
CITRON, ML ;
ORTEGA, LG ;
COHEN, MH .
CHEST, 1989, 95 (01) :71-75
[3]   THE UPPER ARM APPROACH FOR PLACEMENT OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS FOR PROTRACTED VENOUS ACCESS [J].
ANDREWS, JC ;
MARX, MV ;
WILLIAMS, DM ;
SPROAT, I ;
WALKERANDREWS, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (02) :427-429
[4]   VERY LOW-DOSES OF WARFARIN CAN PREVENT THROMBOSIS IN CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL [J].
BERN, MM ;
LOKICH, JJ ;
WALLACH, SR ;
BOTHE, A ;
BENOTTI, PN ;
ARKIN, CF ;
GRECO, FA ;
HUBERMAN, M ;
MOORE, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 112 (06) :423-428
[5]   EVALUATION OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER THROMBOGENICITY [J].
BOROW, M ;
CROWLEY, JG .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 29 :59-64
[6]   INSERTION OF GROSHONG CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS UTILIZING FLUOROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES [J].
BURNETT, AF ;
LOSSEF, SV ;
BARTH, KH ;
GRENDYS, EC ;
JOHNSON, JC ;
BARTER, JF ;
BARNES, WA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 52 (01) :69-73
[8]  
DAMASCELLI B, 1986, EUR J RADIOL, V6, P210
[9]  
DAMASCELLI B, 1990, CANCER, V66, P237, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900715)66:2<237::AID-CNCR2820660207>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-F