An algebra of human concept learning

被引:79
作者
Feldman, Jacob [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Cognit Sci, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
concepts; induction; complexity; learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmp.2006.03.002
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 [数学]; 070101 [基础数学];
摘要
An important element of learning from examples is the extraction of patterns and regularities from data. This paper investigates the structure of patterns in data defined over discrete features, i.e. features with two or more qualitatively distinct values. Any such pattern can be algebraically decomposed into a spectrum of component patterns. each of which is a simpler or more atomic "regularity." Each component regularity involves a certain number of features, referred to as its degree. Regularities of lower degree represent simpler or more coarse patterns in the original pattern, while regularities of higher degree represent finer or more idiosyncratic patterns. The full spectral breakdown of a pattern into component regularities of minimal degree, referred to as its power series, expresses the original pattern in terms of the regular rules or patterns it obeys, amounting to a kind of "theory" of the pattern. The number of regularities at various degrees necessary to represent the pattern is tabulated in its power spectrum, which expresses how much of a pattern's structure can be explained by regularities of various levels of complexity. A weighted mean of the pattern's spectral power gives a useful numeric summary of its overall complexity, called its algebraic complexity. The basic theory of algebraic decomposition is extended in several ways, including algebraic accounts of the typicality of individual objects within concepts, and estimation of the power series from noisy data. Finally some relations between these algebraic quantities and empirical data are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 368
页数:30
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]
AHN WK, 1992, COGNITIVE SCI, V16, P81, DOI 10.1016/0364-0213(92)90018-P
[2]
Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality [J].
Ahn, WK ;
Kim, NS ;
Lassaline, ME ;
Dennis, MJ .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (04) :361-416
[3]
THE ADAPTIVE NATURE OF HUMAN CATEGORIZATION [J].
ANDERSON, JR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (03) :409-429
[4]
WHAT SOME CONCEPTS MIGHT NOT BE [J].
ARMSTRONG, SL ;
GLEITMAN, LR ;
GLEITMAN, H .
COGNITION, 1983, 13 (03) :263-308
[5]
The neurobiology of human category learning [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Ell, SW .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (05) :204-210
[6]
DECISION RULES IN THE PERCEPTION AND CATEGORIZATION OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULI [J].
ASHBY, FG ;
GOTT, RE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1988, 14 (01) :33-53
[7]
A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Alfonso-Reese, LA ;
Turken, AU ;
Waldron, EM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) :442-481
[8]
DIMENSIONS OF SIMILARITY [J].
ATTNEAVE, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1950, 63 (04) :516-556
[9]
Barlow H.B., 1994, LARGE SCALE NEURONAL, P1
[10]
Blair A, 2003, YEARB EUR ASSO EDU, V5, P31