The FDA and drug safety - A proposal for sweeping changes

被引:54
作者
Furberg, Curt D.
Levin, Arthur A.
Gross, Peter A.
Shapiro, Robyn S.
Strom, Brian L.
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Ctr Med Consumers, New York, NY USA
[3] Hackensack Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Internal Med, Hackensack, NJ USA
[4] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr Study Bioeth, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Educ & Res Therapeut, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.166.18.1938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) system of regulating drug safety has serious limitations and is in need of changes. The major problems include the following: the design of initial preapproval studies lets uncommon, serious adverse events go undetected; massive underreporting of adverse events to the FDA postmarketing surveillance system reduces the ability to quantify risk accurately; manufacturers do not fulfill the majority of their postmarketing safety study commitments; the FDA lacks authority to pursue sponsors who violate regulations and ignore postmarketing safety study commitments; the public increasingly perceives the FDA as having become too close to the regulated pharmaceutical industry; the FDA's safety oversight structure is suboptimal; and the FDA's expertise and resources in drug safety and public health are limited. To address these problems, we urge Congress, which is ultimately responsible for the FDA's performance, to implement the following 5 recommendations: ( 1) give the FDA more direct legal authority to pursue violations, ( 2) authorize the adoption of a conditional drug approval policy, at least for selected drugs, ( 3) provide additional financial resources to support the safety operations, ( 4) mandate a reorganization of the agency with emphasis on strengthening the evaluation and proactive monitoring of drug safety, and ( 5) require broader representation of safety experts on the FDA's advisory committees.
引用
收藏
页码:1938 / 1942
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Evaluating drug effects in the post-Vioxx world there must be a better way [J].
Avorn, J .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 113 (18) :2173-2176
[2]  
Caplovitz A, 2006, TURNING MED SNAKE OI
[3]  
*COMM GOV REF, 2005, OP STAT CHAIRM T DAV
[4]   Valvular heart disease associated with fenfluramine-phentermine [J].
Connolly, HM ;
Crary, JL ;
McGoon, MD ;
Hensrud, DD ;
Edwards, BS ;
Edwards, WD ;
Schaff, HV .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (09) :581-588
[5]  
CROLEY SP, 1996, AM U ADM LAW J, P111
[6]  
*CTR SCI PUBL INT, 2005, CONFL INT COX 2 PAN
[7]  
*FDA, 2005, FDA AW CONTR DAT ADV
[8]  
*FDA, 2006, FED REGISTER, V71, P10978
[9]   The safety of newly approved medicines - Do recent market removals mean there is a problem? [J].
Friedman, MA ;
Woodcock, J ;
Lumpkin, MM ;
Shuren, JE ;
Hass, AE ;
Thompson, LJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (18) :1728-1734
[10]  
GOOZNER M, 2006, PUBLICS FAITH FDA SH