The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy

被引:22
作者
Issa, Muta M.
Zasada, Witold
Ward, Kevin
Hall, John A.
Petros, John A.
Ritenour, Chad W. M.
Goodman, Michael
Kleinbaum, David
Mandel, Jack
Marshall, Fray F.
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol AVAMC 112, Decatur, GA 30033 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA 30033 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION | 2006年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词
digital rectal examination; prostate specific antigen; prostate cancers diagnosis; sensitivity; specificity; predictive value; normal PSA; serum PSA; international prostate symptom score; IPSS; body mass index; family history;
D O I
10.1016/j.cdp.2006.04.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: As digital rectal examination (DRE) remains an essential part of a routine physical examination, it is important to understand its diagnostic value in different circumstances. Aim: To quantify sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of DRE as a predictor of biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer in the US Veteran population. Methods: The study group included 628 consecutive patients who underwent transrectal biopsy for suspected prostate cancer due to abnormal digital examination of the prostate, elevated serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) or both. The DRE results reported in this study are documented during physical examinations that were performed after referral for biopsy. The relation between DRE results and positive biopsy was examined while taking into consideration demographic and clinical patient characteristics. Results: Among men with normal PSA the adjusted odds ratio (OR) reflecting the association between abnormal DRE and positive prostate biopsy was 0.53 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.27 to 1.06. In the presence of a moderately elevated (4.1-10 ng/mL) PSA, the OR was 1.07 (0.72-1.60). When serum PSA exceeded 10 ng/mL, the OR was 2.15 (1.12-4.43). The positive predictive value of an abnormal DRE varied widely from as high as 81% to as low as 14% depending on the other patient characteristics. Discussion: These results indicate that DRE results are most informative when evaluated in conjunction with other clinical and demographic information. (c) 2006 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Lest we abandon digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer [J].
Basler, JW ;
Thompson, IM .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (23) :1761-1763
[2]  
Boyko EJ, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P307, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010207
[3]   Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng/ml or less [J].
Carvalhal, GF ;
Smith, DS ;
Mager, DE ;
Ramos, C ;
Catalona, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (03) :835-839
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER USING THE DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION [J].
CHODAK, GW ;
KELLER, P ;
SCHOENBERG, HW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (05) :1136-1138
[5]   Sociodemographic and clinical risk characteristics of patients with prostate cancer within the veterans affairs health care system: Data from capsure [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Penson, DF ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (03) :905-908
[6]  
*DEP VET AFF, 2006, FACTS DEP VET AFF WA
[7]   Body mass index as a predictor of prostate cancer: Development versus detection on biopsy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Terris, MK ;
Platz, EA ;
Presti, JC .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (01) :108-113
[8]   Prostate cancer epidemiology [J].
Grönberg, H .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9360) :859-864
[9]   Screening for prostate cancer: An update of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Harris, R ;
Lohr, KN .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (11) :917-929
[10]   The diagnostic value of digital rectal examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Hoogendam, A ;
Buntinx, F ;
de Vet, HCW .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (06) :621-626