Do health promotion messages target cognitive and behavioural correlates of condom use?: A content analysis of safer sex promotion leaflets in two countries

被引:13
作者
Abraham, C [1 ]
Krahé, B
Dominic, R
Fritsche, I
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Social Sci, Ctr Res Hlth & Med, Brighton BN1 9SN, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Univ Magdeburg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1348/135910702169466
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective. To categorize and quantify the content of publicly available safer sex promotion leaflets in the UK and Germany and to assess the extent to which this content corresponds to the cognitive and behavioural correlates of condom use identified by theory-based research. Methods. A content analysis using a 45 category coding manual was undertaken. The manual included 20 'correlate-representative' categories identifying text promoting the strongest cognitive and behavioural correlates of condom use. Results. Overall inter-coder reliability was high. Few content differences were observed between the German and UK samples. Leaflets from both countries highlighted information on how people become infected with HIV and advice to contact health care professionals. Few mentioned delaying or abstaining from sexual intercourse. Only 25% of leaflets included text that referred to more than 10 of the 20 correlate-representative categories. Moreover, using one standard deviation above the mean as an indication of frequent inclusion, two-thirds of leafets failed to target frequently more than two of the 20 correlate-representative categories. Conclusions. Some safer sex promotion leaflets frequently promote the strongest cognitive and behavioural correlates of condom use. In general, however, the recommendations of researchers investigating psychological correlates of condom use have not shaped the content of safer sex promotion leaflets.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 246
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   When good intentions are not enough: Modeling postdecisional cognitive correlates of condom use [J].
Abraham, C ;
Sheeran, P ;
Norman, P ;
Conner, M ;
de Vries, N ;
Otten, W .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 29 (12) :2591-2612
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
ALLEN KE, 1985, PHARM J 0810, P181
[4]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[5]   THE SELF-REGULATION OF ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND BEHAVIOR [J].
BAGOZZI, RP .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1992, 55 (02) :178-204
[6]   Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory [J].
Bandura, A .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1998, 13 (04) :623-649
[7]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[8]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, VVol. 1
[9]  
Becker M H, 1977, Med Care, V15, P27, DOI 10.1097/00005650-197705001-00005
[10]   The role of risk perception and efficacy cognitions in the prediction of HIV-related preventive behavior and condom use [J].
Bengel, J ;
BelzMerk, M ;
Farin, E .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1996, 11 (04) :505-525