A critique of social capital

被引:85
作者
Navarro, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES | 2002年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.2190/6U6R-LTVN-FHU6-KCNU
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article critiques the concepts of communitarianism and social capital as used in the United States and in Europe. For the United States, the author focuses on Robert Putnam's understanding of both concepts, showing that the apolitical analysis of the Progressive Era, of the progressive developments in Northern Italy, and of the situation of labor unions in the United States is not only insufficient but wrong. The critique also includes the difference between U.S. communitarianism and its European versions, Christian democracy and New Labour, and the limitations of both approaches. The uses and misuses of these concepts in the political debate are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 432
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BOIX C, 2000, IMPORTANCIA CAPITAL
[2]  
BOURDIEU P, 1992, INVITATION REFLEXIVE, P118
[3]  
Coleman J., 1987, EC IMPERIALISM EC ME
[4]   Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies [J].
Curtis, JE ;
Baer, DE ;
Grabb, EG .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 66 (06) :783-805
[5]   New labour: New Christian democracy? [J].
Huntington, N ;
Bale, T .
POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2002, 73 (01) :44-50
[6]  
Lewin T., 2001, NY TIMES, pA14
[7]  
LEWIN T, 2001, NY TIMES 0415, pA1
[8]  
LEXINGTON, 2002, ECONOMIST 0223, P40
[9]  
NAVARRO V, 2001, POLITICAL EC SOCIAL
[10]  
PUTNAM R, 1993, MAKING DEMOCRACY WOR, P28