Plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine: Sources of variability and preliminary observations on relations with clinical response

被引:38
作者
Jannuzzi, G
Gatti, G
Magni, P
Spina, E
Pacifici, R
Zuccaro, P
Torta, R
Guarneri, L
Perucca, E
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Dept Internal Med & Therapeut, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Spedali Civil Brescia, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
[3] Univ Brescia, Sch Brescia, Psychiat Unit, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
[4] Univ Turin, Neurosci Dept, Turin, Italy
[5] Ist Super Sanita, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Messina, Inst Pharmacol, Messina, Italy
关键词
fluoxetine; norfluoxetine; enantiomers; therapeutic drug monitoring; population pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1097/00007691-200210000-00006
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Factors affecting the plasma concentrations of the R- and S-enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were investigated in 131 adult patients receiving long-term fluoxetine, of 10 to 60 mg/d (mean, 24 +/- 10 mg/d). Plasma concentration values (geometric means, Cl 95%) in these patients were 186 (156, 223) nmol/L for S-fluoxetine, 67 (58, 77) nmol/L for R-fluoxetine, 247 (212, 287) nmol/L for S-norfluoxetine, and 118 (102, 137) nmol/L for R-norfluoxetine. The difference between the concentrations of the respective R- and S-enantiomers was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) for both the parent drug and the demethylated metabolite. A significant correlation was found between the concentrations of each enantiomer and the prescribed daily dosage (r = 0.44, P < 0.0001 for S-fluoxetine; r = 0.48, P < 0.0001 for R-fluoxetine-, r = 0.36, P < 0.0001 for S-norfluoxetine; r = 0.32, P = 0.0003 for R-norfluoxetine), but the variability in concentration at any given dosage was considerable. When an iterative model based on multiple polynomial regressions was applied to determine the potential contributions of dosage, age, gender, body weight, and concomitant medication to the variability in the plasma concentration of the enantiomers, dosage was consistently found to provide the greatest predictive value. The predictive value of the model could be consistently improved when concentrations of other enantiomers were included as covariates. Of 58 patients with depressive symptoms for whom evaluation of clinical response (CGI scale) was available, 33 (57%) responded favorably to treatment. The plasma levels of individual enantiomers and of the active moiety (ActM, sum of the concentrations of R-fluoxetine, S-fluoxetine, and S-norfluoxetine) in these patients did not differ significantly from those found in patients with unsatisfactory therapeutic response. Likewise, the concentrations of individual enantiomers and of the ActM were similar in patients with or without adverse effects. Overall, these results demonstrate that the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine exhibit marked stereoselectivity and considerable interpatient variability, which could not be explained by differences in gender, age, or comedication. In addition, a considerable variability was found in the enantiomers' concentrations associated with a favorable therapeutic response.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 627
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]   CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS OF FLUOXETINE [J].
ALTAMURA, AC ;
MORO, AR ;
PERCUDANI, M .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 26 (03) :201-214
[3]  
Amsterdam JD, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P963
[4]  
Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
[5]   THERAPEUTIC DRUG-MONITORING - RELEVANCE DURING THE DRUG-TREATMENT OF PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS [J].
BALANTGORGIA, EA ;
BALANT, LP .
CNS DRUGS, 1995, 4 (06) :432-453
[6]   Concentrations of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine after multiple doses of fluoxetine in cytochrome P4502D6 poor and extensive metabolizers [J].
Eap, CB ;
Bondolfi, G ;
Zullino, D ;
Savary-Cosendai, L ;
Powell-Golay, K ;
Kosel, M ;
Baumann, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 21 (03) :330-334
[7]   COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCIES OF RANDOMIZED CONCENTRATION-CONTROLLED AND DOSE-CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ENDRENYI, L ;
ZHA, JH .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 56 (03) :331-338
[8]  
FEIGHNER JP, 1985, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V46, P20
[9]   The stereoselective metabolism of fluoxetine in poor and extensive metabolizers of sparteine [J].
Fjordside, L ;
Jeppesen, U ;
Eap, CB ;
Powell, K ;
Baumann, P ;
Brosen, K .
PHARMACOGENETICS, 1999, 9 (01) :55-60
[10]  
FREES E, 1996, DATA ANAL USING REGR, P167