Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation: How confident are anesthesiologists?

被引:29
作者
Jacka, MJ [1 ]
Cohen, MM
To, T
Devitt, JH
Byrick, R
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Care Res Program, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[4] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Hlth Adm, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[5] Hosp Sick Children, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[6] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Populat Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Anaesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
cardiac; pulmonary artery catheter; pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; technology; vascular; anesthesiology;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200206000-00003
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: The pulmonary artery catheter is a controversial device, and randomized evaluation of its effectiveness has been demanded. Accurate estimation of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure is important for optimal use of the pulmonary artery catheter. Anesthesiologists use the pulmonary artery catheter frequently but have not been surveyed about confidence in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation. Our objective was to determine the ability of practicing cardiovascular anesthesiologists to estimate pulmonary artery occlusion pressure accurately and measure their confidence in this estimate. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting. All academic and community hospitals in English-speaking Eastern Canada and selected centers in Western Canada and the United States. Patients. Cardiovascular anesthesiologists. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results. We measured agreement with expert-defined timing of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation, estimation of a sample pulmonary artery occlusion pressure trace, and management of a hypothetical clinical complication (air embolism). Seventy-seven percent of 345 anesthesiologists responded. Agreement about the optimal timing of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation (89%) and the management of air embolism (85%) was near expectations (expected 90%). However, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure waveform was interpreted accurately by only 61%, whereas 28% disagreed and 11% were uncertain. Significant positive associations (p =.016) between continuing medical education items and accurate interpretation were observed. Conclusions: Estimation of a sample pulmonary artery occlusion pressure trace by practicing anesthesiologists was in only modest agreement with expert assessment and published standards. Anesthesiologists demonstrated substantially less confidence in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation than in the optimal timing of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation. Before the effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in clinical care can be systematically assessed, efforts are needed to enhance accuracy and consistency of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1203
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SURVEY METHODS COMMU
[2]   PREOPERATIVE OPTIMIZATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR HEMODYNAMICS IMPROVES OUTCOME IN PERIPHERAL VASCULAR-SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
BERLAUK, JF ;
ABRAMS, JH ;
GILMOUR, IJ ;
OCONNOR, SR ;
KNIGHTON, DR ;
CERRA, FB .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 214 (03) :289-299
[3]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF COMPLICATIONS OF PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERIZATIONS IN 500 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS [J].
BOYD, KD ;
THOMAS, SJ ;
GOLD, J ;
BOYD, AD .
CHEST, 1983, 84 (03) :245-249
[4]   A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF DELIBERATE PERIOPERATIVE INCREASE OF OXYGEN DELIVERY ON MORTALITY IN HIGH-RISK SURGICAL PATIENTS [J].
BOYD, O ;
GROUNDS, RM ;
BENNETT, ED .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (22) :2699-2707
[5]  
Brook R H, 1986, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V2, P53
[6]  
CLARK CA, 1988, CRITICAL CARE, P294
[7]   The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients [J].
Connors, AF ;
Speroff, T ;
Dawson, NV ;
Thomas, C ;
Harrell, FE ;
Wagner, D ;
Desbiens, N ;
Goldman, L ;
Wu, AW ;
Califf, RM ;
Fulkerson, WJ ;
Vidaillet, H ;
Broste, S ;
Bellamy, P ;
Lynn, J ;
Knaus, WA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (11) :889-897
[8]   ASSESSING HEMODYNAMIC STATUS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - DO PHYSICIANS USE CLINICAL INFORMATION OPTIMALLY [J].
CONNORS, AF ;
DAWSON, NV ;
MCCAFFREE, DR ;
GRAY, BA ;
SICILIANO, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 2 (03) :174-180
[9]   PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERIZATION - AN ASSESSMENT OF RISKS AND BENEFITS IN 220 SURGICAL PATIENTS [J].
DAVIES, MJ ;
CRONIN, KD ;
DOMAINGUE, CM .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1982, 10 (01) :9-14
[10]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION COMPARED TO PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IN THE HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
EISENBERG, PR ;
JAFFE, AS ;
SCHUSTER, DP .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1984, 12 (07) :549-553