Evidence for Field Cancerization of the Prostate

被引:113
作者
Nonn, Larisa [1 ]
Ananthanarayanan, Vijayalakshmi [1 ]
Gann, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Pathol, Coll Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; field effects; biomarkers; PROLIFERATIVE INFLAMMATORY ATROPHY; CANCER DNA PHENOTYPE; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; PROMOTER METHYLATION; EARLY IDENTIFICATION; ANTIGEN-EXPRESSION; NEGATIVE BIOPSIES; CLONAL EVOLUTION; GENE-EXPRESSION; TISSUE ADJACENT;
D O I
10.1002/pros.20983
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Field cancerization, which is not yet well-characterized in the prostate, occurs when large areas of an organ or tissue surface are affected by a carcinogenic insult, resulting in the development of multi-focal independent premalignant foci and molecular lesions that precede histological change. METHODS. Herein, we review the cumulative body of evidence concerning field effects in the prostate and critically evaluate the methods available for the identification and validation of field effect biomarkers. Validated biomarkers for field effects have an important role to play as surrogate endpoint biomarkers in Phase II prevention trials and as clinical predictors of cancer in men with negative biopsies. RESULTS. Thus far, field effects have been identified involving nuclear morphometric changes, gene expression, protein expression, gene promoter methylation, DNA damage and angiogenesis. In addition to comparing cancer-adjacent benign tissue to more distant areas or to "supernormal" tissue from cancer-free organs, investigators can use a nested case-control design for negative biopsies that offers a number of unique advantages. CONCLUSIONS. True carcinogenic field effects should be distinguished from secondary responses of the microenvironment to a developing tumor, although the latter may still lead to useful clinical prediction tools. Prostate 69: 1470-1479, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1470 / 1479
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   RASSF1A promoter methylation is frequently detected in both pre-malignant and non-malignant microdissected prostatic epithelial tissues [J].
Aitchison, Alan ;
Warren, Anne ;
Neal, David ;
Rabbitts, Pamela .
PROSTATE, 2007, 67 (06) :638-644
[2]   Alteration of proliferation and apoptotic markers in normal and premalignant tissue associated with prostate cancer [J].
Ananthanarayanan, V ;
Deaton, RJ ;
Yang, XMJ ;
Pins, MR ;
Gann, PH .
BMC CANCER, 2006, 6 (1)
[3]   Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression in normal prostatic glands and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN): Association with diagnosis of prostate cancer [J].
Ananthanarayanan, V ;
Deaton, RJ ;
Yang, XMJ ;
Pins, MR ;
Gann, PH .
PROSTATE, 2005, 63 (04) :341-346
[4]   High levels of phosphorylated form of Akt-1 in prostate cancer and non-neoplastic prostate tissues are strong predictors of biochemical recurrence [J].
Ayala, G ;
Thompson, T ;
Yang, G ;
Frolov, A ;
Li, RL ;
Scardino, P ;
Ohori, M ;
Wheeler, T ;
Harper, W .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (19) :6572-6578
[5]   DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF THE PS2 PROTEIN IN THE HUMAN PROSTATE AND PROSTATE-CANCER - ASSOCIATION WITH PREMALIGNANT CHANGES AND NEUROENDOCRINE DIFFERENTIATION [J].
BONKHOFF, H ;
STEIN, U ;
WELTER, C ;
REMBERGER, K .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1995, 26 (08) :824-828
[6]  
Bostwick DG, 1998, CANCER, V83, P1995, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981101)83:9<1995::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-2
[8]   Differences in gene expression in prostate cancer, normal appearing prostate tissue adjacent to cancer and prostate tissue from cancer free organ donors [J].
Chandran, UR ;
Dhir, R ;
Ma, CQ ;
Michalopoulos, G ;
Becich, M ;
Gilbertson, J .
BMC CANCER, 2005, 5 (1)
[9]  
Chu TY, 1999, GENE CHROMOSOME CANC, V24, P127, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199902)24:2<127::AID-GCC5>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-8