Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation?

被引:27
作者
Larsen, T
Nguyen, TH
Greisen, G
Engholm, G
Moller, H
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Neonatol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 2000年 / 107卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11695.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the association between gestational age estimated from the last menstrual. period. (GA(LMP)) or from the biparietal diameter (GA(BPD)), and the subsequent birthweight for gestational age: Design Population-based followup study. Setting Of 21,936 pregnancies contained in the ultrasound database, 16,387 singleton pregnancies with a reliable last menstrual period date and an ultrasound examination between 12 and 22 weeks of gestation were included. Main outcome measures Correlation between: 1. birthweight deviation (birthweight-expected weight for gestation); 2. birthweight; and 3. pregnancy length and (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)). Relative risk of birthweight < 2500 g and low birthweight for gestation (> 22% below normal weight) related to Eve levels of discrepancy between (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)). Results (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)) was not associated with deviation of birthweight related to GA(BPD). However the risk of low birthweight (< 2500) and low birthweight for gestational age was significantly increased when (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)) was > 7 days. Conclusion A biparietal diameter smaller than expected from the last menstrual period date is mainly a problem of an error related to estimated time of ovulation, At the same time the relative risk: of a low birthweight infant is slightly increased.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 244
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BANGE D, 1987, NEW ZEAL MED J, V100, P284
[2]  
CAMPBELL S, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P613
[3]   Dating of pregnancy: Time to forget the last menstrual period [J].
Gardosi, J .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 9 (06) :367-368
[4]   ULTRASOUND INSTEAD OF LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD AS THE BASIS OF GESTATIONAL-AGE ASSIGNMENT [J].
GEIRSSON, RT .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 1 (03) :212-219
[5]   CERTAIN DATES MAY NOT PROVIDE A RELIABLE ESTIMATE OF GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
GEIRSSON, RT ;
BUSBYEARLE, RMC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (01) :108-109
[6]   COMPARISON OF ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF BIPARIETAL DIAMETER AND LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD AS A PREDICTOR OF DAY OF DELIVERY IN WOMEN WITH REGULAR 28-DAY CYCLES [J].
KIELER, H ;
AXELSSON, O ;
NILSSON, S ;
WALDENSTROM, U .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 72 (05) :347-349
[7]   THE VALIDITY OF GESTATIONAL-AGE ESTIMATION BY MENSTRUAL DATING IN TERM, PRETERM, AND POSTTERM GESTATIONS [J].
KRAMER, MS ;
MCLEAN, FH ;
BOYD, ME ;
USHER, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (22) :3306-3308
[8]   NORMAL FETAL GROWTH EVALUATED BY LONGITUDINAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS [J].
LARSEN, T ;
PETERSEN, S ;
GREISEN, G ;
LARSEN, JF .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 24 (01) :37-45
[9]  
LARSEN T, 1988, UGESKR LIGER, V159, P299
[10]   Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights [J].
Marsal, K ;
Persson, PH ;
Larsen, T ;
Lilja, H ;
Selbing, A ;
Sultan, B .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 1996, 85 (07) :843-848