Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: Concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms

被引:45
作者
Lehman, C
Holt, S
Peacock, S
White, E
Urban, N
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle Canc Care Alliance, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the use of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) by community radiologists by determining the concordance of assessment categories and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study comprised the interpretations of 82,620 consecutive screening mammograms by 18 radiologists between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1998. For all mammograms, assessment categories and recommendations were compared to determine whether they were in accordance with BI-RADS guidelines. Overall patterns of discordance were analyzed, and comparisons of discordant patterns by assessment category, patient age, breast density, and year of examination were made. RESULTS. The overall discordance between BI-RADS assessments and recommendations was low (3%). The assessment with the highest discordance was "probably benign finding" (category 3), at 53.5%. Mammograms obtained in 1998 were almost half as likely to have assessment-recommendation discordance compared with those obtained in 1995 (2.4% vs 4.5%, respectively; odds ratio = 0.52; p < 0.001). Mammograms of women with dense breast tissue were 30% more likely to have lesions assigned discordant assessments and recommendations compared with those of women with fatty tissue (3.4% vs 2.7%, respectively; odds ratio = 1.3; p < 0.001). No differences in the patterns of discordance were found between mammograms of women younger than 50 years and those of women 50 years old and older (p = 0.10). CONCLUSION. There has been improvement in the accurate application of BI-RADS since its introduction. However, variation in the pairing of BI-RADS assessments and recommendations persists. Continued efforts to educate radiologists about the use of BI-RADS and to clarify BI-RADS terms would promote maximum consistency in this use of this reporting method.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]   Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Floyd, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) :773-778
[3]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[5]   READING AND DECISION AIDS FOR IMPROVED ACCURACY AND STANDARDIZATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS [J].
DORSI, CJ ;
GETTY, DJ ;
SWETS, JA ;
PICKETT, RM ;
SELTZER, SE ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :619-622
[6]   ENHANCED INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGES [J].
GETTY, DJ ;
PICKETT, RM ;
DORSI, CJ ;
SWETS, JA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (04) :240-252
[7]   Positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system [J].
Lacquement, MA ;
Mitchell, D ;
Hollingsworth, AB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (01) :34-40
[8]   The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories [J].
Liberman, L ;
Abramson, AF ;
Squires, FB ;
Glassman, JR ;
Morris, EA ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :35-40
[9]  
*QUAL MAMM STAND, 1997, FIN RUL DEP HLTH HUM