Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair

被引:409
作者
Lederle, FA [1 ]
Johnson, GR
Wilson, SE
Ballard, DJ
Jordan, WD
Blebea, J
Littooy, FN
Freischlag, JA
Bandyk, D
Rapp, JH
Salam, AA
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Cooperat Studies Program Coordinating Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Surg, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[4] Baylor Hlth Care Syst, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Surg, Hershey, PA USA
[7] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Hines, IL USA
[8] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Tampa, FL USA
[10] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[11] Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30033 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2002年 / 287卷 / 22期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.287.22.2968
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who have high operative risk, repair is usually deferred until the AAA reaches a diameter at which rupture risk is thought to outweigh operative risk, but few data exist on rupture risk of large AAA. Objective To determine the incidence of rupture in patients with large AAA. Design and Setting Prospective cohort study in 47 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Patients Veterans (n= 198) with AAA of at least 5.5 cm for whom elective AAA repair was not planned because of medical contraindication or patient refusal. Patients were enrolled between April 1995 and April 2000 and followed up through July 2000 (mean, 1.52 years). Main Outcome Measure Incidence of AAA rupture by strata of initial and attained diameter. Results Outcome ascertainment was complete for all patients. There were 112 deaths (57%) and the autopsy rate was 46%. Forty-five patients had probable AAA rupture. The 1-year incidence of probable rupture by initial AAA diameter was 9.4% for AAA of 5.5 to 5.9 cm, 10.2% for AAA of 6.0 to 6.9 cm (19.1 % for the subgroup of 6.5-6.9 cm), and 32.5% for AAA of 7.0 cm or more. Much of the increased risk of rupture associated with initial AAA diameters of 6.5-7.9 cm was related to the likelihood that the AAA diameter would reach 8.0 cm during follow-up, after which 25.7% ruptured within 6 months. Conclusion The rupture rate is substantial in high-operative-risk patients with AAA of at least 5.5 cm in diameter and increases with larger diameter.
引用
收藏
页码:2968 / 2972
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Prognosis of patients turned down for conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular and sonographic era: Szilagyi revisited?
    Conway, KP
    Byrne, J
    Townsend, M
    Lane, IF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (04) : 752 - 757
  • [2] DARLING RC, 1977, CIRCULATION, V56, P161
  • [3] Jones A, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1382
  • [4] RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - THE INTERNIST AS DIAGNOSTICIAN
    LEDERLE, FA
    PARENTI, CM
    CHUTE, EP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 96 (02) : 163 - 167
  • [5] Risk of rupture of large abdominal aortic aneurysms - Disagreement among vascular surgeons
    Lederle, FA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (09) : 1007 - 1009
  • [6] Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Lederle, FA
    Wilson, SE
    Johnson, GR
    Reinke, DB
    Littooy, FN
    Acher, CW
    Ballard, DJ
    Messina, LM
    Gordon, IL
    Chute, EP
    Krupski, WC
    Bandyk, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (19) : 1437 - 1444
  • [7] Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening
    Lederle, FA
    Johnson, GR
    Wilson, SE
    Chute, EP
    Littooy, FN
    Bandyk, D
    Krupski, WC
    Barone, GW
    Acher, CW
    Ballard, DJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (06) : 441 - +
  • [8] The autopsy - An antidote to misdiagnosis
    McPhee, SJ
    [J]. MEDICINE, 1996, 75 (01) : 41 - 43
  • [9] A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
    Peduzzi, P
    Concato, J
    Kemper, E
    Holford, TR
    Feinstein, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (12) : 1373 - 1379
  • [10] Powell JT, 2001, ACTA CHIR BELG, V101, P11