Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections

被引:56
作者
Paik, DS
Beaulieu, CF
Jeffrey, RB
Karadi, CA
Napel, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Lucas MRS Ctr P268, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Med Informat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
CT colonography; virtual colonoscopy; projection; polyp; colon; polyps;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-200003000-00001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the limitations to the effectiveness of CT colonography, colloquially called virtual colonoscopy (VC), for detecting polyps in the colon and to describe a new technique, map projection CT colonography using Mercator projection and stereographic projection, that overcomes these limitations. Method: In one experiment, data sets from nine patients undergoing CT colonography were analyzed to determine the percentage of the mucosal surface visible in various visualization modes as a function of field of view (FOV). In another experiment, 40 digitally synthesized polyps of various sizes (10, 7, 5, and 3.5 mm) were randomly inserted into four copies of one patient data set. Both Mercator and stereographic projections were used to visualize the surface of the colon of each data set. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated and compared with the results of an earlier study of visualization modes using the same CT colonography data. Results: The percentage of mucosal surface visualized by VC increases with greater FOV but only approaches that of map projection VC (98.8%) at a distorting, very high FOV. For both readers and polyp sizes of greater than or equal to 7 mm, sensitivity for Mercator projection (87.5%) and stereographic projection (82.5%) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than for viewing axial slices (62.5%), and Mercator projection was significantly more sensitive than VC (67.5%). Mercator and stereographic projection had PPVs of 75.4 and 78.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity of conventional CT colonography is limited by the percentage of the mucosal surface seen. Map projection CT colonography overcomes this problem and provides a more sensitive method with a high PPV for detecting polyps than other methods currently being investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 188
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ahlquist D A, 1997, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V7, P439
[2]  
[Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
[3]   Display modes for CT colonography - Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies [J].
Beaulieu, CF ;
Jeffrey, RB ;
Karadi, C ;
Paik, DS ;
Napel, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (01) :203-212
[4]   Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: Implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition [J].
Beaulieu, CF ;
Napel, S ;
Daniel, BL ;
Ch'en, IY ;
Rubin, GD ;
Johnstone, IM ;
Jeffrey, RB .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (04) :656-663
[5]  
Bendl R., 1995, Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine. First International Conference, CVRMed '95. Proceedings, P287, DOI 10.1007/BFb0034963
[6]   Small simulated polyps in pig colon: Sensitivity of CT virtual colography [J].
Dachman, AH ;
Lieberman, J ;
Osnis, RB ;
Chen, SYJ ;
Hoffmann, KR ;
Chen, CT ;
Newmark, GM ;
McGill, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (02) :427-430
[7]   CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps [J].
Dachman, AH ;
Kuniyoshi, JK ;
Boyle, CM ;
Samara, Y ;
Hoffmann, KR ;
Rubin, DT ;
Hanan, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) :989-995
[8]  
DRABI K, 1997, 1 JOINT C COMP VIS V, P323
[9]  
FELON HM, 1998, AJR, V170, P1303
[10]   Virtual colonoscopy: What will the issues be? [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Ferrucci, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (02) :453-458