Sorafenib in advanced melanoma: a Phase II randomised discontinuation trial analysis

被引:490
作者
Eisen, T.
Ahmad, T.
Flaherty, K. T.
Gore, M.
Kaye, S.
Marais, R.
Gibbens, I.
Hackett, S.
James, M.
Schuchter, L. M.
Nathanson, K. L.
Xia, C.
Simantov, R.
Schwartz, B.
Poulin-Costello, M.
O'Dwyer, P. J.
Ratain, M. J.
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Urol Unit, Sutton SMT 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Bayer Pharmaceut Corp, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
sorafenib; multikinase inhibitor; advanced melanoma; V600E BRAF; randomised discontinuation trial;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603291
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The effects of sorafenib - an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the tumour and tumour vasculature - were evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a large multidisease Phase II randomised discontinuation trial (RDT). Enrolled patients received a 12-week run-in of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Patients with changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements < 25% from baseline were then randomised to sorafenib or placebo for a further 12 weeks (ie to week 24). Patients with >= 25% tumour shrinkage after the run-in continued on open-label sorafenib, whereas those with >= 25% tumour growth discontinued treatment. This analysis focussed on secondary RDT end points: changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements from baseline after 12 weeks and overall tumour responses (WHO criteria) at week 24, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and biomarkers (BRAF, KRAS and NRAS mutational status). Of 37 melanoma patients treated during the run-in phase, 34 were evaluable for response: one had >= 25% tumour shrinkage and remained on open-label sorafenib; six (16%) had < 25% tumour growth and were randomised (placebo, n = 3; sorafenib, n = 3); and 27 had >= 25% tumour growth and discontinued. All three randomised sorafenib patients progressed by week 24; one remained on sorafenib for symptomatic relief. All three placebo patients progressed by week-24 and were re-started on sorafenib; one experienced disease re-stabilisation. Overall, the confirmed best responses for each of the 37 melanoma patients who received sorafenib were 19% stable disease (SD) (ie n = 1 open-label; n = 6 randomised), 62% (n = 23) progressive disease (PD) and 19% (n = 7) unevaluable. The overall median PFS was 11 weeks. The six randomised patients with SD had overall PFS values ranging from 16 to 34 weeks. The most common drug-related adverse events were dermatological (eg rash/desquamation, 51%; hand-foot skin reaction, 35%). There was no relationship between V600E BRAF status and disease stability. DNA was extracted from the biopsies of 17/22 patients. Six had V600E-positive tumours (n = 4 had PD; n = 1 had SD; n = 1 unevaluable for response), and 11 had tumours containing wild- type BRAF (n = 9 PD; n = 1 SD; n = 1 unevaluable for response). In conclusion, sorafenib is well tolerated but has little or no antitumour activity in advanced melanoma patients as a single agent at the dose evaluated (400 mg b.i.d.). Ongoing trials in advanced melanoma are evaluating sorafenib combination therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ADNANE L, 2005, AACR NCI EORTC NOV 2
[2]   Metastatic melanoma - Is biochemotherapy the future? [J].
Alexandrescu, DT ;
Dutcher, JR ;
Wiernik, PH .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 22 (02) :101-111
[3]   Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics of BAY 43-9006 administered for 21 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours [J].
Awada, A ;
Hendlisz, A ;
Gil, T ;
Bartholomeus, S ;
Mano, M ;
de Valeriola, D ;
Strumberg, D ;
Brendel, E ;
Haase, CG ;
Schwartz, B ;
Piccart, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (10) :1855-1861
[4]   Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system [J].
Balch, CM ;
Soong, SJ ;
Gershenwald, JE ;
Thompson, JF ;
Reintgen, DS ;
Cascinelli, N ;
Urist, M ;
McMasters, KM ;
Ross, MI ;
Kirkwood, JM ;
Atkins, MB ;
Thompson, JA ;
Coit, DG ;
Byrd, D ;
Desmond, R ;
Zhang, YT ;
Liu, PY ;
Lyman, GH ;
Morabito, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (16) :3622-3634
[5]   Differential impact of Raf-1 kinase activity on tumor cell resistance to paclitaxel and docetaxel [J].
Britten, RA ;
Klein, K .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2000, 11 (06) :439-443
[6]  
Brose MS, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P6997
[7]   Clinical significance of BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma [J].
Chang D.Z. ;
Panageas K.S. ;
Osman I. ;
Polsky D. ;
Busam K. ;
Chapman P.B. .
Journal of Translational Medicine, 2 (1)
[8]   Safety and pharmacokinetics of the dual action Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, BAY 43-9006, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors [J].
Clark, JW ;
Eder, JP ;
Ryan, D ;
Lathia, C ;
Lenz, HJ .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (15) :5472-5480
[9]   Improving outcomes in advanced malignant melanoma - Update on systemic therapy [J].
Danson, S ;
Lorigan, P .
DRUGS, 2005, 65 (06) :733-743
[10]   Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer [J].
Davies, H ;
Bignell, GR ;
Cox, C ;
Stephens, P ;
Edkins, S ;
Clegg, S ;
Teague, J ;
Woffendin, H ;
Garnett, MJ ;
Bottomley, W ;
Davis, N ;
Dicks, N ;
Ewing, R ;
Floyd, Y ;
Gray, K ;
Hall, S ;
Hawes, R ;
Hughes, J ;
Kosmidou, V ;
Menzies, A ;
Mould, C ;
Parker, A ;
Stevens, C ;
Watt, S ;
Hooper, S ;
Wilson, R ;
Jayatilake, H ;
Gusterson, BA ;
Cooper, C ;
Shipley, J ;
Hargrave, D ;
Pritchard-Jones, K ;
Maitland, N ;
Chenevix-Trench, G ;
Riggins, GJ ;
Bigner, DD ;
Palmieri, G ;
Cossu, A ;
Flanagan, A ;
Nicholson, A ;
Ho, JWC ;
Leung, SY ;
Yuen, ST ;
Weber, BL ;
Siegler, HF ;
Darrow, TL ;
Paterson, H ;
Marais, R ;
Marshall, CJ ;
Wooster, R .
NATURE, 2002, 417 (6892) :949-954