Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: In vitro and in vivo observations

被引:237
作者
Wei, K [1 ]
Skyba, DM [1 ]
Firschke, C [1 ]
Jayaweera, AR [1 ]
Lindner, JR [1 ]
Kaul, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV VIRGINIA,MED CTR,DIV CARDIOVASC,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22908
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00029-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. We attempted to examine the interactions between ultrasound and microbubbles. Background. The interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound are poorly understood. We hypothesized that 1) ultrasound destroys microbubbles, and 2) this destruction can be minimized by limiting the exposure of microbubbles to ultrasound. Methods. We performed in vitro and in vivo experiments in which microbubbles were insonated at different frequencies, transmission powers and pulsing intervals. Video intensity decay was measured in vitro and confirmed by measurements of microbubble size and concentrations. Peak video intensity and mean microbubble myocardial transit rates were measured in vivo. Results. Imaging at lower frequencies and higher transmission powers resulted in more rapid video intensity decay (p = 0.01), and decreasing exposure of microbubbles to ultrasound minimized their destruction in vitro. Although these effects were also noted in vivo with venous injections of microbubbles, they were not seen with aortic root or direct coronary artery injections. Conclusions. Ultrasound results in microbubble destruction that is more evident at lower frequencies and higher acoustic powers. Reducing the exposure of microbubbles to ultrasound minimizes their destruction. This effect is most marked in vivo with venous rather than aortic or direct coronary injections of microbubbles. These findings could lead to effective strategies for myocardial perfusion imaging with venous injections of microbubbles. (C)1997 by the American College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1088
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Burns PN, 1996, CLIN RADIOL, V51, P50
  • [2] ACOUSTIC CAVITATION PRODUCED BY MICROSECOND PULSES OF ULTRASOUND - A DISCUSSION OF SOME SELECTED RESULTS
    CRUM, LA
    ROY, RA
    DINNO, MA
    CHURCH, CC
    APFEL, RE
    HOLLAND, CK
    MADANSHETTY, SI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (02) : 1113 - 1119
  • [3] PRINCIPLES AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTS
    DEJONG, N
    TENCATE, FJ
    LANCEE, CT
    ROELANDT, JRTC
    BOM, N
    [J]. ULTRASONICS, 1991, 29 (04) : 324 - 330
  • [4] DEJONG N, 1993, ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES, P52
  • [5] DEJONG N, 1993, ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES, P86
  • [6] DEJONG N, 1993, ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES, P47
  • [7] DEJONG N, 1993, ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES, P11
  • [8] CONTINUOUS-FLOW, RESISTIVE-PARTICLE COUNTING
    GEAR, ARL
    [J]. ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1976, 72 (1-2) : 332 - 345
  • [9] ACOUSTICALLY FORCED-OSCILLATIONS OF AIR BUBBLES IN WATER - EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
    HOLT, RG
    CRUM, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (04) : 1924 - 1932
  • [10] Jayaweera A R, 1990, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, V3, P91