Comparison of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephadroxil and cefprozil as prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections in children

被引:18
作者
Belet, N [1 ]
Islek, I
Belet, U
Sunter, AT
Küçüködük, S
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Turkey
[3] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Turkey
关键词
recurrent urinary tract infection; children; prophylaxis; cephadroxil; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; cefprozil; UTI; pediatric UTI;
D O I
10.1179/joc.2004.16.1.77
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of prophylactic trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ), cefprozil and cephadroxil treatments in children who have recurrent urinary tract infection, but no urinary tract pathology. After acute urinary tract infections (UTIs) were treated, the patients were divided into 3 groups randomly and TMP/SMZ was given to 21 patients, cephadroxil was given to 25 patients and cefprozil was given to 34 patients for 3 months-one dose at night. All patients were followed for 6 months following prophylaxis. The frequency of symptomatic UTIs among groups during prophylaxis was not statistically different, however the number of symptomatic UTIs in the cephadroxil group was lower than the other groups. Asymptomatic bacteriuria episodes were detected in TMP/SMZ and cefprozil groups, whereas no asymptomatic bacteriuria episodes were seen in the cephadroxil group. The number of patients with symptomatic UTI during the follow-up period was not different between groups, however all the asymptomatic bacteriuria episodes were encountered in the cefprozil group. In conclusion, in this study cephadroxil was found to be slightly superior to TMP/SMZ and cefprozil in preventing asymptomatic bacteriuria episodes and symptomatic UTIs in children with recurrent UTI and normal urinary tract system.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 81
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Ahmed SM, 1998, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V57, P1573
[2]
Allen UD, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V160, P1436
[3]
Antibacterial prophylaxis in children with urinary tract infection [J].
Bollgren, I .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 1999, 88 :48-52
[4]
BRENDSTRUP L, 1990, ACTA PAEDIATR SCAND, V79, P1225
[5]
CHON CH, 1940, PEDIATR CLIN N AM, V48, P1441
[6]
*COMM INF DIS AM A, 1997, RED BOOK REP COMM IN, P1469
[7]
CEFACLOR AND CEFADROXIL - COMMENTARY ON THEIR PROPERTIES AND POSSIBLE INDICATIONS FOR USE IN PEDIATRICS [J].
GINSBURG, CM ;
MCCRACKEN, GH .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1980, 96 (02) :340-342
[8]
Treatment of urinary tract infections [J].
Hoberman, A ;
Wald, ER .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1999, 18 (11) :1020-1021
[9]
Le Saux N, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V163, P523
[10]
Prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in female children - OM-89 immunotherapy compared with nitrofurantoin prophylaxis in a randomized pilot study [J].
Lettgen, B .
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1996, 57 (06) :464-475