Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial

被引:2659
作者
Douillard, JY [1 ]
Cunningham, D
Roth, AD
Navarro, M
James, RD
Karasek, P
Jandik, P
Iveson, T
Carmichael, J
Alakl, M
Gruia, G
Awad, L
Rougier, P
机构
[1] Ctr Rene Gauducheau, F-44805 St Herblain, France
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp, London SW3 6JJ, England
[3] Hosp Cantonal, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Hosp Duran & Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Masaryk Mem Canc Inst, Brno, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Hosp, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[7] Royal S Hants Hosp, Southampton SO9 4PE, Hants, England
[8] City Hosp, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[9] Rhone Poulenc, Rorer, France
[10] Hosp A Pare, Boulogne, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02034-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Irinotecan is active against colorectal cancer in patients whose disease is refractory to fluorouracil. We investigated the efficacy of these two agents combined for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods 387 patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (other than adjuvant) for advanced colorectal cancer were randomly assigned open-label irinotecan plus fluorouracil and calcium folinate (irinotecan group, n=199) or fluorouracil and calcium folinate alone (no-irinotecan group, n=188). Infusion schedules were once weekly or every 2 weeks, and were chosen by each centre. We assessed response rates and time to progression, and also response duration, survival, and quality of life. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population and on evaluable patients. Findings The response rate was significantly higher in patients in the irinotecan group than in those in the no-irinotecan group (49 vs 31%, p<0.001 for evaluable patients, 35 vs 22%, p<0.005 by intention to treat). Time to progression was significantly longer in the irinotecan group than in the no-irinotecan group (median 6.7 vs 4.4 months, p<0. 001), and overall survival was higher (median 17.4 vs 14.1 months, p=0.031). Some grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were significantly more frequent in the irinotecan group than in the no-irinotecan group, but effects were predictible, reversible, non-cumulative, and manageable. Interpretation Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil and calcium folinate was well-tolerated and increased response rate, time to progression, and survival, with a later deterioration in quality of life. This combination should be considered as a reference first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1047
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] TOPOISOMERASE-I INHIBITORS - TOPOTECAN AND IRENOTECAN
    CREEMERS, GJ
    LUND, B
    VERWEIJ, J
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 1994, 20 (01) : 73 - 96
  • [3] Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Cunningham, D
    Pyrhönen, S
    James, RD
    Punt, CJA
    Hickish, TF
    Heikkila, R
    Johannesen, TB
    Starkhammar, H
    Topham, CA
    Awad, L
    Jacques, C
    Herait, P
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) : 1413 - 1418
  • [4] TOPOISOMERASE-TARGETING ANTITUMOR DRUGS
    DARPA, P
    LIU, LF
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1989, 989 (02) : 163 - 177
  • [5] De Gramont A, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, P985
  • [6] Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen):: A clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ducreux, M
    Ychou, M
    Seitz, JF
    Bonnay, M
    Bexon, A
    Armand, JP
    Mahjoubi, M
    Méry-Mignard, D
    Rougier, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) : 2901 - 2908
  • [7] FAGES B, 1997, P ASCO, V16
  • [8] PROTRACTED VENOUS INFUSION 5-FLUOROURACIL AND INTERFERON-ALPHA IN ADVANCED AND REFRACTORY COLORECTAL-CANCER
    FINDLAY, M
    HILL, A
    CUNNINGHAM, D
    NORMAN, A
    NICOLSON, M
    FORD, H
    HUSBAND, J
    EVANS, C
    CARTER, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) : 239 - 243
  • [9] GIACCHETTI S, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, P229
  • [10] GLIMELIUS B, 1994, CANCER, V73, P556, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<556::AID-CNCR2820730310>3.0.CO