Classifier ensembles for land cover mapping using multitemporal SAR imagery

被引:236
作者
Waske, Bjorn [1 ]
Braun, Matthias [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Bonn, Ctr Remote Sensing & Land Surfaces, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
关键词
Decision tree; Random forests; Boosting; Multitemporal SAR data; Land cover classification; DECISION TREE; DISCRIMINATION; FOREST; IDENTIFICATION; EFFICIENCY; ACCURACY; FEATURES; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.01.003
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
SAR data are almost independent from weather conditions, and thus are well suited for mapping of seasonally changing variables such as land cover. In regard to recent and upcoming missions, multitemporal and multi-frequency approaches become even more attractive. In the present study, classifier ensembles (i.e., boosted decision tree and random forests) are applied to multi-temporal C-band SAR data, from different study sites and years. A detailed accuracy assessment shows that classifier ensembles, in particularly random forests, outperform standard approaches like a single decision tree and a conventional maximum likelihood classifier by more than 10% independently from the site and year. They reach up to almost 84% of overall accuracy in rural areas with large plots. Visual interpretation confirms the statistical accuracy assessment and reveals that also typical random noise is considerably reduced. In addition the results demonstrate that random forests are less sensitive to the number of training samples and perform well even with only a small number. Random forests are computationally highly efficient and are hence considered very well suited for land cover classifications of future multifrequency and multitemporal stacks of SAR imagery. (C) 2009 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 457
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Data mining with decision trees and decision rules [J].
Apte, C ;
Weiss, S .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 1997, 13 (2-3) :197-210
[2]   A comparison of decision tree ensemble creation techniques [J].
Banfield, Robert E. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 29 (01) :173-180
[3]   An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants [J].
Bauer, E ;
Kohavi, R .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 36 (1-2) :105-139
[4]   NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH ;
ERSOY, OK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04) :540-552
[5]   Efficiency of crop identification based on optical and SAR image time series [J].
Blaes, X ;
Vanhalle, L ;
Defourny, P .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 96 (3-4) :352-365
[6]   SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation [J].
Blewitt, Marnie E. ;
Gendrel, Anne-Valerie ;
Pang, Zhenyi ;
Sparrow, Duncan B. ;
Whitelaw, Nadia ;
Craig, Jeffrey M. ;
Apedaile, Anwyn ;
Hilton, Douglas J. ;
Dunwoodie, Sally L. ;
Brockdorff, Neil ;
Kay, Graham F. ;
Whitelaw, Emma .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (05) :663-669
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   Multiple classifiers applied to multisource remote sensing data [J].
Briem, GJ ;
Benediktsson, JA ;
Sveinsson, JR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (10) :2291-2299
[10]  
BRISCO B, 1995, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V61, P1009