Turning off cortical ensembles stops striatal Up states and elicits phase perturbations in cortical and striatal slow oscillations in rat in vivo

被引:45
作者
Kasanetz, Fernando
Riquelme, Luis A.
O'Donnell, Patricio
Murer, M. Gustavo
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Med, Dept Fisiol, RA-1121 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Albany Med Coll, Ctr Neuropharmacol & Neurosci, Albany, NY 12208 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON | 2006年 / 577卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1113/jphysiol.2006.113050
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In vivo, cortical neurons and striatal medium spiny neurons (MSN) display robust subthreshold depolarizations (Up states) during which they are enabled to fire action potentials. In the cortex, Up states are believed to occur simultaneously in a neuronal ensemble and to be sustained by local network interactions. It is known that MSN are impelled into the Up state by extra-striatal (primarily cortical) inputs, but the mechanisms that sustain and determine the end of striatal Up states are still debated. Furthermore, it has not been established if brisk perturbations of ongoing cortical oscillations alter rhythmic transitions between Up and Down states in striatal neurons. Here we report that MSN Up states terminate abruptly when persistent activity in cortical ensembles providing afferents to a given striatal region is turned off by local electrical stimulation or ends spontaneously. In addition, we found that phase perturbations in MSN membrane potential slow oscillations induced by cortical stimulation replicate the stimulus-induced dynamics of spiking activity in cortical ensembles. Overall, these results suggest that striatal Up states are single-cell subthreshold representations of episodes of persistent spiking in cortical ensembles. A precise spatial and temporal alignment between episodes of cortical persistent activity and striatal Up states would allow MSN to detect specific cortical inputs embedded within a more general cortical signal.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 113
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CAMBRIDGE STUDIES AD
[2]   Information processing, dimensionality reduction and reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia [J].
Bar-Gad, I ;
Morris, G ;
Bergman, H .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2003, 71 (06) :439-473
[3]  
Blackwell KT, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P9123
[4]   Excitatory GABAergic effects in striatal projection neurons [J].
Bracci, E ;
Panzeri, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 95 (02) :1285-1290
[5]   Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks [J].
Buzsáki, G ;
Draguhn, A .
SCIENCE, 2004, 304 (5679) :1926-1929
[6]   SYNAPTIC AND INTRINSIC CONTROL OF MEMBRANE EXCITABILITY OF NEOSTRIATAL NEURONS .1. AN INVIVO ANALYSIS [J].
CALABRESI, P ;
MERCURI, NB ;
STEFANI, A ;
BERNARDI, G .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (04) :651-662
[7]   In vivo induction of striatal long-term potentiation by low-frequency stimulation of the cerebral cortex [J].
Charpier, S ;
Mahon, S ;
Deniau, JM .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 91 (04) :1209-1222
[8]   Attractor dynamics of network UP states in the neocortex [J].
Cossart, R ;
Aronov, D ;
Yuste, R .
NATURE, 2003, 423 (6937) :283-288
[9]   Fast synaptic transmission between striatal spiny projection neurons [J].
Czubayko, U ;
Plenz, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (24) :15764-15769
[10]   Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing [J].
Engel, AK ;
Fries, P ;
Singer, W .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (10) :704-716