Facilitating advance care planning for patients with end-stage renal disease: The patient perspective

被引:139
作者
Davison, Sara N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Div Nephrol & Immunol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2006年 / 1卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.2215/CJN.01050306
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Comprehensive care of patients with ESRD requires expertise in advance care planning (ACP), including attention to ethical, psychosocial, and spiritual issues related to starting, continuing, withholding, and stopping dialysis. However, there are no standards of care regarding when to initiate or how to facilitate ACP. The purpose of this study was to determine the perspectives of patients with ESRD of the salient elements of ACP discussions. An ethnographic, qualitative, in-depth interview study was conducted of outpatients of a university-affiliated nephrology program. Twenty-four patients with ESRD were purposively selected from the renal insufficiency, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis clinics. Establishing patient "buy-in" by identifying perceived benefits of ACP along with acknowledging patients' sense of personal empowerment were critical both for the effective framing of facilitated ACP and for determining patients' ability to participate in facilitated ACP. Patients required more information and earlier initiation of ACP discussions. Information needed to focus more on the individual and how his or her illness and interventions would affect his or her life and relationships and what he or she values most. Empathetic listening also was viewed as an integral component of facilitated ACP. Physicians clearly were seen as having the responsibility for initiating and guiding ACP. The role of patients and family within ACP is complex and varies significantly between patients. For most, family was an integral component of ACP, and many relied extensively on family to make end-of-life decisions. These findings identify a precarious tension between patients' preferences in terms of facilitated ACP and current clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1028
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INNOVATIONS END LIFE
[2]  
Chambers JC, 2004, SCI PRAC ECOL REST, P1
[3]   Survival of Medicare patients after enrollment in hospice programs [J].
Christakis, NA ;
Escarce, JJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (03) :172-178
[4]   PATIENT ATTITUDES AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DIALYSIS DISCONTINUATION [J].
COHEN, LM ;
GERMAIN, M ;
WOODS, A ;
GILMAN, ED ;
MCCUE, JD .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1993, 34 (05) :395-401
[5]  
Cohen-Almagor R, 2000, J LAW MED ETHICS, V28, P267
[6]  
DAVISON S, 2002, SEMIN DIALYSIS, V15, P1
[7]   Enough - The failure of the living will [J].
Fagerlin, A ;
Schneider, CE .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2004, 34 (02) :30-42
[8]  
Fine A, 2005, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V25, P269
[9]   Can clinical interventions change care at the end of life? [J].
Hanson, LC ;
Tulsky, JA ;
Danis, M .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (05) :381-388
[10]  
Hines S C, 2001, J Palliat Med, V4, P481, DOI 10.1089/109662101753381629